0
The major argument was the absence of a Bill of Rights in the Constitution
What else can I help you with?
What do you call a federalist that is against the ratification of the US Constitution?
Federalists were for the ratification of the Constitution. Those who opposed such ratification were called Anti-Federalists or Confederalists.
Who fought for and against ratification of the constitution?
Federalists fought for the ratification of the constitution and anti-federalists fought against it. For more information, visit the Related Question.
Was one argument against ratification of the Constitution that it gave too much power to the states?
NO. The Anti-Federalists who opposed the US Constitution were angered that the Constitution gave too little power to the states and too much power to the federal government.
What major arguments did the anti Federalist offer in opposition to ratification of the constitution?
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
What were anti federalists reasons for opposing ratification?
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
Which argument against the ratification of the federal constitution was used least?
C. Senators would be elected by the state legislatures.
In 1787 what was a major argument against ratification of the US constitution?
A major argument against the ratification of the US Constitution in 1787 was the absence of a Bill of Rights, which critics believed left individual liberties vulnerable to government infringement. Opponents, known as the Anti-Federalists, feared that a strong central government could become tyrannical and limit the freedoms of citizens. They argued that the Constitution concentrated too much power in the federal government at the expense of state sovereignty. This debate highlighted the tension between the need for a unified nation and the protection of individual rights.
What do you call a federalist that is against the ratification of the US Constitution?
Federalists were for the ratification of the Constitution. Those who opposed such ratification were called Anti-Federalists or Confederalists.
How did the anti-federalists present their argument against ratification?
by loling
Who fought for and against ratification of the constitution?
Federalists fought for the ratification of the constitution and anti-federalists fought against it. For more information, visit the Related Question.
Was one argument against ratification of the Constitution that it gave too much power to the states?
NO. The Anti-Federalists who opposed the US Constitution were angered that the Constitution gave too little power to the states and too much power to the federal government.
Why did antifederalists argue against ratification of the constitution?
it had no bill of rights
Who opposed ratifying the constitution ND what was their major argument against ratification's?
Opponents of ratifying the Constitution were known as the Anti-Federalists, which included figures like Patrick Henry and George Mason. Their major argument against ratification centered on the fear that the new federal government would be too powerful, undermining states' rights and individual liberties. They also criticized the lack of a Bill of Rights, believing it was essential to protect citizens' freedoms from potential government overreach.
The greatest attack against ratification of the Constitution was that it did not have a Bill of Rights for the people?
True
The Anti-Federalists opposed ratification of the U.S. Constitution because they?
The Anti-Federalists opposed ratification of the U.S. Constitution because they were against increasing the power of the national government.
What two groups fought back forth about ratifying the constitution?
The Federalists, who were for the ratification of the Constitution, and the Anti-federalists, who were against the ratification.
What was an important argument against the proposal constitution?
it did not guarantee basic rights
