C. Senators would be elected by the state legislatures.
NO. The Anti-Federalists who opposed the US Constitution were angered that the Constitution gave too little power to the states and too much power to the federal government.
Opponents of ratifying the Constitution were known as the Anti-Federalists, which included figures like Patrick Henry and George Mason. Their major argument against ratification centered on the fear that the new federal government would be too powerful, undermining states' rights and individual liberties. They also criticized the lack of a Bill of Rights, believing it was essential to protect citizens' freedoms from potential government overreach.
A major argument against the ratification of the US Constitution in 1787 was the absence of a Bill of Rights, which critics believed left individual liberties vulnerable to government infringement. Opponents, known as the Anti-Federalists, feared that a strong central government could become tyrannical and limit the freedoms of citizens. They argued that the Constitution concentrated too much power in the federal government at the expense of state sovereignty. This debate highlighted the tension between the need for a unified nation and the protection of individual rights.
I believe one argument he made was that there are no provisions for cessation in the Constitution. One problem with the argument is that according to the Constitution any powers not given to the federal government are reserved to the states.
federal goverment
The main reason was the need for a stronger Federal government.
The main reason was the need for a stronger Federal government.
The main reason was the need for a stronger Federal government.
The Supreme Court was both the sword and the purse of the federal government
Patrick Henry, a famous Virginian man, gave fiery speeches against the ratification of the Constitution. He believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government and threatened the rights of individuals and states. Henry argued for states' rights and the inclusion of a Bill of Rights in the Constitution to protect individual liberties.
The Anti-Federalists argued that a new Constitution would be a step towards monarchy and that the country would be bled dry through state and federal taxation.
The delegates of the Constitutional Convention added the Bill of Rights to the Constitution as a compromise between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to ensure ratification. This limited the power of the federal government and solidified power for the states.