"Invalid contract" might describe the terms of an agreement that purports to be a contract--but by one or more legal theories does not constitute one, and is therefore unenforceable as one. This refers to a defect in contract formation--whose elements are those of mutual assent (effectively-communicated offer and acceptance) and consideration (a bargained-benefit or detriment). An "invalid contract" may or may not be enforceable as a set of one or more enforceable promises, depending on whether alternative theories apply, such as that of promissory estoppel.
Void contract, as compared with voidable contract,refers to a contract that has become void by reason of one or more contract-law avoidance theories. A voidable contract is one voidable at the option of one of the parties. Two examples: a contract entered into for an illegal purpose is void. A contract entered into by a minor is voidable at the minor's option unless subsequently ratified.
when the principle die the irrevocable power of attorney is valid or invalid
definitly valid. recommend me
The base word in "invalid" is "valid," which means something that is acceptable or true. When you add the prefix "in-" to "valid," it changes the meaning to "not valid" or "not acceptable."
it is valid
The word invalid is an adjective. It describes something that is not valid.
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
It is neither valid nor invalid. It all depends on your purchasing power.
An invalid argument is when the facts you are using are invalid or your forms of defense are wrong or incorrect, a valid argument is the opposite of an invalid argument. "There is a windmill in my beard. your argument is invalid." (This is a good example of a bad contradiction)
The argument denying the antecedent is invalid.
It is either valid or invalid
Salad, ballad, valid
No, but it can be unsound and valid.