0
What else can I help you with?
Opponents to increased immigration argue that immigrants .?
nova net :need to have bilingual education in all schools
Opponents to increased immigration argue that immigrants _____.?
nova net :need to have bilingual education in all schools
How Immigration supporters argue that immigrants .?
Immigration supporters argue that immigrants contribute significantly to the economy by filling labor shortages, driving innovation, and creating jobs. They highlight that immigrants often take on essential roles in various sectors, including healthcare and agriculture, which are crucial for societal functioning. Additionally, supporters point out that immigrants enrich cultural diversity and bring unique perspectives, fostering social cohesion and community resilience. Overall, they contend that a more inclusive immigration policy benefits both immigrants and the host society.
Will there be an immigration attorneys?
If you are currently dealing with a problem of immigration then yes you can find an attorney who specifically works with immigration and can try to help you stay in the country if they have good grounds to argue for it.
What do these headlines suggest about undocumented immigrants civil liberties?
While courts have protected undocumented immigrants’ civil liberties, some argue that those protections are being ignored
What social evils do critics associate with immigration?
Critics of immigration often associate it with social evils such as increased crime rates, job competition that drives down wages for native workers, and strain on public resources like healthcare and education systems. They argue that an influx of immigrants can lead to cultural dilution and social tensions, particularly in communities facing economic challenges. Additionally, concerns about illegal immigration can fuel narratives around national security and public safety. These views can sometimes overshadow the positive contributions immigrants make to society.
Why did populists support limits on immagration?
Populists often support limits on immigration because they believe it protects domestic jobs and wages for native workers, fearing that an influx of immigrants can lead to competition for employment and lower wages. Additionally, they may argue that restricting immigration preserves national identity and cultural values, viewing immigrants as a threat to social cohesion. This stance can also be fueled by concerns over security and the perceived strain on public services. Overall, populist rhetoric tends to emphasize the interests of the "common people" over those of immigrants.
Is the dream act a controversy?
Yes, the DREAM Act is controversial as it involves providing a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who entered the US as children. Supporters argue it helps talented individuals contribute to society, while opponents raise concerns about rewarding illegal immigration.
Should illegal immigrants have the opportunity to obtain legal residence and citizenship?
The question of whether illegal immigrants should have the opportunity to obtain legal residence and citizenship is complex and often debated. Proponents argue that it allows for integration into society, acknowledges their contributions to the economy, and promotes social stability. Opponents may contend that it undermines legal immigration processes and could encourage further illegal immigration. Ultimately, any decision should consider the humanitarian aspects, economic implications, and the rule of law.
Why did strict constructionists argue that the government should not create a national bank?
Alexander Hamilton opposed the idea
What social evils do critics associate with mass immigration?
Critics of mass immigration often associate it with social evils such as increased crime rates, strain on public services, and cultural dilution. They argue that a sudden influx of immigrants can lead to competition for jobs, housing, and social resources, potentially resulting in economic instability and social tension. Additionally, concerns about integration and the preservation of national identity are frequently raised, suggesting that mass immigration could undermine social cohesion.
Who felt that immigration threatened the future of American-born citizens?
Many individuals and groups throughout American history have expressed concerns that immigration threatens the future of American-born citizens. This sentiment has often been voiced by nativist movements, which argue that an influx of immigrants can lead to job competition, cultural dilution, and strain on public resources. Prominent examples include the Know-Nothing Party in the 1850s and more recent political factions that advocate for stricter immigration policies. These fears often stem from economic anxieties and cultural changes perceived to be associated with immigration.
