nova net :need to have bilingual education in all schools
nova net :need to have bilingual education in all schools
They argued that most immigrants would work for low wages, which would take the jobs from them.
Immigration supporters argue that immigrants contribute significantly to the economy by filling labor shortages, driving innovation, and creating jobs. They highlight that immigrants often take on essential roles in various sectors, including healthcare and agriculture, which are crucial for societal functioning. Additionally, supporters point out that immigrants enrich cultural diversity and bring unique perspectives, fostering social cohesion and community resilience. Overall, they contend that a more inclusive immigration policy benefits both immigrants and the host society.
Yes, the DREAM Act is controversial as it involves providing a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who entered the US as children. Supporters argue it helps talented individuals contribute to society, while opponents raise concerns about rewarding illegal immigration.
The question of whether illegal immigrants should have the opportunity to obtain legal residence and citizenship is complex and often debated. Proponents argue that it allows for integration into society, acknowledges their contributions to the economy, and promotes social stability. Opponents may contend that it undermines legal immigration processes and could encourage further illegal immigration. Ultimately, any decision should consider the humanitarian aspects, economic implications, and the rule of law.
Supporters of the DREAM Act may face criticism for potentially encouraging illegal immigration by providing a pathway to citizenship for undocumented individuals. Opponents may argue that it undermines legal immigration processes and could lead to increased immigration rates. Additionally, some may express concerns about the financial implications, suggesting that it could burden taxpayers or public services. There may also be a debate around fairness, with critics arguing that it rewards individuals who have broken immigration laws.
Critics of mass immigration often associate it with social evils such as increased crime rates, strain on public services, and cultural dilution. They argue that a sudden influx of immigrants can lead to competition for jobs, housing, and social resources, potentially resulting in economic instability and social tension. Additionally, concerns about integration and the preservation of national identity are frequently raised, suggesting that mass immigration could undermine social cohesion.
that it could kill all the chickens
If you are currently dealing with a problem of immigration then yes you can find an attorney who specifically works with immigration and can try to help you stay in the country if they have good grounds to argue for it.
While courts have protected undocumented immigrants’ civil liberties, some argue that those protections are being ignored
Don't argue with the ref and shake hands with the opponents at the end of a game.
Populist support for limits in immigration can be attributed to several reasons. Firstly, populists often emphasize the protection of national identity and culture, and they believe that unrestricted immigration could threaten these aspects. Additionally, they argue that increased immigration can lead to economic competition for jobs and drive down wages for native workers. Finally, there is also concern among some populists that uncontrolled immigration may pose security risks and strain public resources.