When the spies returned from Jericho, they reported to Joshua that the city was terrified of the Israelites, having heard about their recent victories and the parting of the Red Sea. They specifically mentioned that the inhabitants were afraid and that the Lord had given the land into Joshua's hands. The spies also noted the faith of Rahab, who had protected them, reinforcing the belief that God was with them in their mission to conquer Jericho.
Taken from the Bible's Book of Joshua, the Negro spiritual sings about the Battle of Jericho.
One of the most famous episodes in the biblical conquest of Canaan was the assault on the city of Jericho. As a prelude to the attack on the city, Joshua sent two spies, who found refuge with the harlot, Rahab, who in turn made a covenant to be spared when the attackers slaughtered her fellow citizens. Now, even if there really had been an assault on Jericho, this is an improbable story, since the spies provided no information of value, and were unlikely to do so. But archaeologists tell us there was no Jericho, so there were no spies and no harlot - the spy story just did not happen and we can only surmise how it arose. The simplest answer could lie in that the name Rahab (or Rachab) is very similar to the Hebrew verb rāhab, generally translated as either 'to beset, storm or assault,' or 'to be proud/arrogant'. If Joshua was about to storm or assault Jericho, this could have given rise to the fictional harlot's name, Rahab.
The Israelites were helped by God to escape slavery in Egypt by the sending of a series of plagues upon the Egyptians, by guiding them with a pillar of fire by night and smoke by day, and by parting the Red Sea to enable them to cross over before the waters returned, drowning their pursuers.
One of the most famous episodes in the biblical conquest of Canaan was the assault on the city of Jericho. Joshua had the priests march around the city walls and Yahweh caused the walls to collapse, allowing the Hebrews to storm the city. However, we now know from archaeologists that there was no city at Jericho at that time.As a prelude to the attack on the city, Joshua sent two spies, who found refuge with the harlot, Rahab, who in turn made a covenant to be spared when the attackers slaughtered her fellow citizens (Joshua chapter 2). Now, even if there really had been an assault on Jericho, this is an improbable story, since the spies risked their lives but provided no information of value and were unlikely to do so. But there was no Jericho, so there were no spies and no harlot - the spy story just did not happen and we can only surmise how it arose.An early Semitic deity was named Rahab, and we know that this deity found its way into Hebrew folklore as a sea dragon that was defeated by Yahweh*. However, these allusions are too dissimilar to the innkeeper/harlot of Joshua. Perhaps the simplest answer could lie in that the name Rahab (or Rachab) is very similar to the Hebrew verb rāhab, generally translated as either 'to beset, storm or assault,' or 'to be proud/arrogant'. If Joshua was about to storm or assault Jericho, would this have given rise to the fictional harlot's name, Rahab?Footnote*For example Isaiah 51:9 and Psalms 89:9-10, with indirect references at Ezekiel 29:3, Ezekiel 32:2 and Psalms 87:4.AnswerRahab was an actual woman who lived in Jericho. The presence of scarlet thread in her home suggests she was involved in making or dyeing of cloth. She hid Joshua's spies among the flax on the rooftop, thus saving their lives. They promised to spare her life in return, and she was to mark her house with thread of scarlet as a sign. She later became the mother of Boaz, who was Jesse's grandfather - the line which eventually included Christ.A:Rahab was the harlot who, in the Book of Joshua, aided the spies whom Joshua sent into Jericho before his assault on the city of Jericho. Rahab made a covenant to be spared when the attackers slaughtered her fellow citizens. Now, even if there really had been an assault on Jericho, this is an improbable story, since the spies provided no information of value, and were unlikely to do so. But archaeologists tell us there was no Jericho, so there were no spies and no harlot - the spy story just did not happen and we can only surmise how it arose. The simplest answer could lie in that the name Rahab (or Rachab) is very similar to the Hebrew verb rāhab, generally translated as either 'to beset, storm or assault,' or 'to be proud/arrogant'. If Joshua was about to storm or assaultJericho, this could have given rise to the fictional harlot's name, Rahab.
No offence but...its a bit of a stupid question... there must be 1000's of people called 'joshua' -_-...ok i will tell you what he had...he had some cheese, and think it was cheddar? idk
Oh, dude, Rahab was a risk-taker, for sure. She hid the Israelite spies on her roof under stalks of flax, like a spy thriller in ancient times. Then she straight-up lied to the king's men, telling them the spies had already left the city. And finally, she helped the spies escape by lowering them down the city wall with a rope. Talk about a daring escape plan!
No
God instructed Joshua to lead the Israelites to conquer Jericho by marching around the city once a day for six days and then seven times on the seventh day, followed by blowing trumpets and shouting to bring the walls down. However, Joshua faced disobedience from Achan, who took forbidden items from Jericho, leading to Israel's initial defeat at Ai. This act of disobedience prompted God to reveal the sin to Joshua, highlighting the importance of obedience to His commands in the conquest of the Promised Land.
A:One of the most famous episodes in the biblical conquest of Canaan was the assault on the city of Jericho. In the Book of Joshua, the Israelites marched around the walls of Jericho a total of 13 times and then they came down. The Book of Joshua does not tell us how high or thick the walls were, because there actually were no walls at the time attributed to the conquest of Canaan. We now know from archaeologists that there had been no city at Jericho for many centuries before the arrival of the Hebrews. From a purely historical perspective, the city of Jericho had long been abandoned, and there was only a small village on the site during the Late Bronze Age. The village had no walls to be measured.
A:Scholars tell us that at the time of Joshua's supposed conquest of Jericho, there had been no city on that site for several centuries and therefore no people to conquer. If there had been people there they would have been ethnically West Semitic, otherwise known as Canaanites. Since each Canaanite city had its own king, who was personally accountable to the Egyptian ruler, there was no real concept of nationality in the fifteenth century.
The Bible does not tell us specifically where Zacchaeus lived. It does tell us that when Jesus passed through the town of Jericho, Zacchaeus sought to meet Jesus (Luke 19:1-10). We can assume, therefore, that Zacchaeus lived in Jericho.
The Bible does not tell us of any children born to Joshua, nor does it even tell us if he was married.