when both parties take the problem at hand seriously. they know what the issue is and are both working to solving it through compromise and understanding. NOT someone just giving into the other or someone yelling until the other agrees
In professional life, argument can be effectively used in negotiations, presentations, and discussions to advocate for ideas or solutions. It helps in persuading colleagues and stakeholders by presenting logical reasoning and evidence. Additionally, constructive argument fosters critical thinking and can lead to better decision-making within teams. Ultimately, using argument appropriately can enhance collaboration and drive successful outcomes.
This term is often used in legal proceedings to indicate that a particular objection or argument was not upheld or supported by the court. It means that the objection was not considered valid or successful.
Used to acknowledge a hit in Fencing or a successful criticism or an effective point in argument. Touche, a conjugation of the French verb toucher, meaning to touch.
A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.
Passing an argument by value means that the method that receives the argument can not change the value of the argument. Passing an argument by reference means that the method that receives the argument can change the value of the incoming argument, and the argument may be changed in the orignal calling method.
Instrumentality is a philosophical term. It is generally used to discredit successful theories, statistics, or culture. The present argument is that its idea is a threat to philanthropy for culture.
He believed successful persuasion revolved around tailoring your arguments to: S subject O occasion A audience P purpose
Argument Deductive argument Inductive Argument Analogy
argument
An argument is inductive when it is based on probability, such as statistics. In an inductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
No, an argument cannot be void. An argument can be weak, flawed, or unconvincing, but it still retains its basic structure and content. A void argument would imply that there is no argument at all.
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.