0
Physical evidence is generally considered more reliable than testimonial evidence because it is objective and can be empirically verified. Testimonies can be influenced by personal biases, memory distortions, or external pressures, leading to inaccuracies. In contrast, physical evidence, such as fingerprints or DNA, remains consistent and can be independently analyzed. However, both forms of evidence can complement each other in establishing a comprehensive understanding of a situation.
What else can I help you with?
What is the difference between testimonial and physical evidence?
Evidence in criminal law is any item or testimony that assists in the proof of a prosecution or defense. It can be a weapon, a document, forensic samples or the testimony of a witness, and both sides of a criminal case are allowed to present evidence to the court for consideration. Real evidence is physical evidence, such as a gun, a fingerprint, a photograph, or DNA machine, different from testimonial evidence because it not physical object only is the testimony of a witness.
How is circumstantial evidence distinguished from physical evidence in a criminal investigation?
Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that implies a fact but does not directly prove it, while physical evidence is tangible evidence that can be directly observed or measured. In a criminal investigation, physical evidence is typically more reliable and persuasive than circumstantial evidence because it provides concrete proof of a fact.
Is non-testimonial evidence admissible in court?
From "Criminal Procedure & Constitutional Protections" (Second Edition) Non Testimonial Evidence: "Evidence that does not come from the mouth of a witness and may include conduct; physical evidence that may have the operative effect of proving guilt but has not been deemed to have the same effect as speech" Examples: Blood alcohol test, physical test to identify if a suspect is intoxicated. See case Schmerber v California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966)
Is non testimonial evidence admissible in court?
Yes. Examples might be the results of drug lab or DNA tests. Evidence attempting to be introduced as 'non-testimonial' faces scrutiny and challenge to determine whether it is admissible, or not under the rules of "hearsay" evidence.The US Supreme Court differentiated between "testimonial" and "non-testimonial" witness statements in Crawford v. Washington, (2004) and Davis v. Washington with Hammon v. Indiana, (2006). For more information on these cases, see Related Questions, below.
Why is evidence important?
Because it is now accepted as scientific fact that virtually everyone in the world has different fingerprints. This makes it statistically unlikely that anyone but you could have been at the scene of the crime.
Why must a forensic scientist collect biological evidence before physical evidence?
Biological evidence is much more likely to degrade and become unusable before physical evidence does.
What does it ean if one piece of evidence is more concrete than another?
If one piece of evidence is more concrete than another, it means that it is more tangible, specific, and directly verifiable. Concrete evidence often includes hard data, physical objects, or documented proof, making it easier to support claims or conclusions. In contrast, less concrete evidence may be more abstract, subjective, or reliant on interpretation, making it less persuasive or reliable in establishing a fact.
What type of evidence tends to make a fact in question more or less probable than it would be without the evidence?
Evidence that is relevant and reliable tends to make a fact in question more or less probable. This includes direct evidence, such as eyewitness testimony or physical evidence, which can strongly support or contradict a claim. Circumstantial evidence, while less direct, can also influence probability by suggesting connections or implications related to the fact in question. Ultimately, the strength and credibility of the evidence determine its impact on the likelihood of the fact being true.
What is evidence derived from one or more of the five senses?
Empirical evidence is evidence that is obtained through observation or experimentation using the five senses. This evidence is based on direct sensory experience and is considered objective and reliable in scientific research and investigation.
Oxidative glycolysis is reliable for?
Physical activities lasting more than 2 minutes in duration
Which evidence is more reliable artifacts or written records?
artifacts cause written records can just make up anything.
Why is flash storage a more reliable form of storage as opposed to mechanical storage?
For one thing there is no physical head to crash into the physical platter and damage it.
