Case law is subordinate to statute.
In all common law countries, precedent serves as law. But, statutes can overturn precedent.
If there is a statute (law) on the books, then the judge will apply that law. If there is not a law against a certain activity, the judge will then look to previous rulings from previous courts and follow their direction.
Case law can, however, be overturned. For example, in Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court of the United States established the precedent that states could segregate the races, so long as they provided separate but equal facilities for black and white people. In the 1950s, the Supreme Court overturned this precedent with Brown v. Board.
So case law is not a very strong source of law. It is lower than statutory law, and it can be overturned.
The magnetic field strength decreases with distance from the source, following an inverse-square law. This means that as you move farther away from the source of the magnetic field, the strength of the field diminishes rapidly. Conversely, getting closer to the source will increase the magnetic field strength.
Yes it can be. This is called CASE LAW. And this is when a case comes in that perhaps there are laws for indirectly. When a judge makes a ruling on the case then this is called CASE LAW and future judges will likely follow this ruling for similar cases.
The electric field strength decreases with increasing distance from the source of the field. This relationship follows an inverse square law, meaning that the field strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source. In other words, as the distance from the source doubles, the electric field strength decreases by a factor of four.
anything that's not a case or statute is a secondary source, eg law text books, journals etc.
any physical law stating that some physical quantity or strength is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of that physical quantity.
No, medical records are not a source of law. They may be used as evidence in legal proceedings, but they do not have the authority to establish or interpret laws. Legal sources include statutes, regulations, case law, and legal precedent.
It is a source of CIVIL law, yes.
In short, the constitution is the law of the land, and establishes rules and regulations of what the government can and cannot do. In a Democracy, the source of power comes from the people. In a Republic, the source of power comes from the law, or in this case, the constitution.
British Common Law. Many of the laws come from case law that has been published. In theory if there is no statute and you can find a relevant case that goes back to the Middle Ages you can cite that in your case and win. There have been cases from the 1600's cited to establish precedent and strengthen your arguments. As far as the oldest statutory law in the United States it's the Mayflower Compact.
expatiate on how ethic cultural diversity should be a source of strength
"Laws" are not derived from "case law" - DECISIONS are derived from case law.
voltage