"Non-precedent" refers to a situation or decision that does not set a legal standard or guiding principle for future cases. In legal contexts, a non-precedential ruling may be issued by a court but does not establish binding authority, meaning it cannot be cited as a precedent in future cases. This allows courts to make decisions based on the specifics of a case without creating broader implications for similar cases. Non-precedential decisions often occur in appellate courts when the issues at hand are deemed not significant enough to warrant setting a precedent.
"Precedent" means coming before, something which precedes. In law it means a past decision in a similar case.
The root for precedent is precede - precedent means "an example which is to justify those at a later time".
Precedent
The root word of "precedent" is "precede," which comes from the Latin word "praecedere," meaning "to go before" or "to precede."
Because this means that where precedent occurs that an offense has been dealt with in that manner previous and thus set the bench mark
Pioneer, pioneering, original prototype
precedent
Condition precedent is a term in a contract that means the parties do not have to perform under the contract until a certain event takes place. Condition subsequent means that a contract is in effect until a particular event takes place.
binding(mandatory) precedent persuasive precedent
When a court follows a 'prededent' it means that the same matter (or one very similar to it) has been adjudicated in the past. Altho judges are not REQUIRED to follow precedent, many do.
Means that the parties must perform under the contract because a previously specified event has taken place.
The way the question is asked: USING judicial precedent, means that the judge is following the lead of a decision in a similar case that has already been decided upon and he is ruling the same way using the other case as a guideline. If the questioner meant to ask what does SETTING judicial precedent mean. . . that means that the judge was rendering a decision in a case of a type that had never been tried, or ruled upon, in the past, and that his verdict would set the 'precedent' by which all future cases might be judged. Judges, by the way, do NOT necessarily have to follow precedent in making rulings.