answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What are grounds for damages?

Grounds for damages refer to the legal basis upon which a party can seek compensation for harm or loss caused by another party's actions or negligence. Common grounds include breach of contract, torts such as negligence or defamation, and statutory violations. To successfully claim damages, the injured party must typically demonstrate that the other party owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and that the breach directly caused their loss. Additionally, the damages must be quantifiable and legally recognized.


What is malicious prosecution in tort?

malicious prosecution,i would say, is an action for damages against the plaintiff by the defendant on various grounds....but solely out of malice,ill-will,spite....when i mentioned various grounds i meant that they were just excuses that the defendant used to prosecute the plaintiff whereas in fact his main reason was malice. here,the plaintiff and defendant can be old enemies or even competetors in the industrial realm or otherwise.Also, this case of malicious prosecution will not be justified by facts....rather it will be a a case brought about just to injure he plaintiff.


What can I sue a company for?

You can sue a company for various reasons, such as breach of contract, negligence, discrimination, fraud, or product liability. It is important to consult with a legal professional to determine the specific grounds for your potential lawsuit.


What are the grounds for malpractice against an attorney in PA?

Legal negligence is the only grounds for malpractice against an attorney in PA. There is no specific definition for legal negligence. However, a lawyer can be accused of negligence when he or she is careless and neglects to provide a client with quality legal service.


Can you sue your ex wife for damages?

Possibly, to file and have a chance of winning a lawsuit the person must have grounds to file the suit and provide evidence to prove that damage was incurred due to negligence or a deliberate harmful action by the defendant.


Intentional interference with contractual relations requires a showing of bad faith before liability can be imposed.?

Yes, for example in the Lumley v Gye case, the plaintiff's claim that the defendant had caused a third party to breach a contract with the defendant was rejected on the grounds that the plaintiff had acted in good faith. Meaning the defendant did not intend for any contract to be broken.


In Louisiana if a plaintiff loses a civil case due to the testimony of an expert can the plaintiff hold the expert witness personally liable for damages?

No, not unless the "expert" gave false testimony which would set the stage for an appeal by the either side. The purpose of having an expert witness testify in any case civil or criminal is to sway the jury to the side that is presenting the evidence, so the plaintiff would have no grounds to sue someone who presented factual, truthful claims.


If the cosigner sues the primary and the primary has never defaulted on the loan will they be likely to win?

If the cosigner has not been financially impacted by the actions of the primary borrower, then there is not valid grounds for a lawsuit. This does not mean the suit could not be brought, but the plaintiff would be wasting time and money as a judgment cannot be awarded where damages have not occurred.


On what public policy policy grounds is strict liability imposed?

Under the doctorine of strict liability , a person who enages in certain activities can be held responbsible for any harm that result to others even if the person used the utmost care. Libability for injury is imposed for reasons other than fault .


What are the grounds for an injunction?

An injunction may be granted on several grounds, primarily when there is a threat of irreparable harm to the plaintiff if the injunction is not issued. The plaintiff must also demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits of the case, the absence of an adequate remedy at law, and that the balance of hardships favors the plaintiff. Additionally, the injunction must serve the public interest. These criteria help ensure that the injunction is justified and not overly broad or punitive.


What document sets the grounds for the court's jurisdiction basis of the case and the relief that the plaintiff seeks?

what web site d.h.s. case


Your son was attacked by a pittbull should you file a civil case against the owners?

Should you, or can you? If your child was injured as a result of the owner's negligence with regard to their maintenance of their dog, then you certainly have grounds for a suit. Depending on what state you are in, there may also be a strict liability statute, whereby the owner is liable for the injuries caused by the dog regardless of their negligence. Whether you should sue someone is a moral question - and depends on too many factors to be addressed in this forum. But whether you can sue - to that I can safely answer, probably yes.