If delegates to the convention never made compromises then many bonds with the USA. small states would be loosened. This would weaken the trust of the government.
If delegates to the convention never made compromises then many bonds with the USA. small states would be loosened. This would weaken the trust of the government.
The delegates at the Annapolis Convention - namely Alexander Hamilton, who wrote the report calling for the Constitutional Convention. James Madison supporters, however, might beg to differ, but either way it was Hamilton and Madison who pushed for the convention.
They were afraid Congress might try to end Slavery or the Slave trade
Because if they didn't make so hard to change they will be changing it all the time.
Because if they didn't make so hard to change they will be changing it all the time.
Because if they didn't make so hard to change they will be changing it all the time.
33
Arkansas, South Carolina, and North Carolina, Florida might have been one, not sure though.
They established a system of checks and balances whereby they hoped to balance the different areas of government and prevent one area from taking over.
The best way I know to explain this is to describe how the process has changed over the years. A long time ago there were no primaries or conventions. Party leaders met in "smoke filled rooms" and chose who the candidates would be. Obviously, this wasn't very fair to the voters. Only a few people controlled the nomination process. No one knew what secret deals were being made.Later, parties started conventions and brought a few hundred delegates together to choose a candidate. This widened the process, and eliminated some of the secrecy, but still pretty much limited it to a handful of white males.Reforms in the 1960s created the primary system as we know it. Now any registered voter can have a say in who the candidates are. Conventions are still held to write a party platform and kick off the campaign. Delegates that attend the convention still officially vote for and decide the nomination. They are supposed to vote for the candidate that the state's voters chose, and since the delegates are loyal members of the party, they almost always cast their vote the way they are supposed to. But if no candidate gathered enough delegates, the convention has to decide. Also, if for some reason no candidate was decided on the first ballot (voting round) then the delegates may start changing their votes on subsequent ballots.So, the convention is more of a formality now, but it is possible that the nomination could be decided at the convention. Candidates in third place may also have delegates at the convention, and if there are enough of them, the candidate might encourage his or her delegates to vote for the second place candidate. The combination of votes might put the second place candidate over the top.Have I confused you more?
Conventionally, no. Which means that they can be horizontal - it is only convention stopping them. However, because you are breaking with convention, you might need to explain what you have done and why.Conventionally, no. Which means that they can be horizontal - it is only convention stopping them. However, because you are breaking with convention, you might need to explain what you have done and why.Conventionally, no. Which means that they can be horizontal - it is only convention stopping them. However, because you are breaking with convention, you might need to explain what you have done and why.Conventionally, no. Which means that they can be horizontal - it is only convention stopping them. However, because you are breaking with convention, you might need to explain what you have done and why.
i think it might be 8 bits to a bite not 100 percent though