The Kalamazoo Case of 1874 set a precedent that taxing citizens for secondary education (post elementary school) was legal.
Miranda v Arizona was the case that set the precedent that verbal warnings must be given to a suspect during arrest.
A precedent is when the outcome of a case helps set the rules for future cases. A judge doesnâ??t have to use a precedent in the ruling, but precedents can be used to predict how a case will turn out.
Precedent
that all ballsacks are to be round
precedent
John Marshall managed to set the principle of judicial review.
The landmark case that set a precedent for identifying a class of fundamental personal rights is Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). This case established the right to privacy as a fundamental right, extending protections to activities such as marital privacy and contraception. The ruling in Griswold laid the foundation for future cases involving personal autonomy and privacy rights.
A precedent is a case that set the basis for any later case to be judged on, if it has the same principles. This is so cases of the same type may get the same outcome, depending on the circumstances.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Executive privileges does not protect everything the president does. It set the precedent that another president will pardon the crimes of the past president. That's why you will never see a president prosecuted for any crimes.
The precedent for voluntary union of the colonies was set with the fundamental orders of Connecticut.