I would approach the city council and ask them to either direct enforcement or modify the city code to match the reality of code enforcement.
Nolle Prosequi.Nolle prosequi is a Latin term meaning "we shall no longer prosecute". It is a declaration made by a prosecutor in a criminal case or by a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit either before or during trial, meaning the case against the defendant is being dropped. The declaration may be made because the charges cannot be proved, the evidence has demonstrated either innocence or a fatal flaw in the prosecution's claim, or the prosecutor has reason to believe that the accused is not guilty. It is generally made after indictment, but it is not a guarantee that the person won't be reindicted
Threaten his family a little.
The first thing you must do is document the statements that they are telling lies about. Once you have done this you must bring it to your local prosecuting attorney and demand that he/she file criminal fraud charges against Sun Trust. If the prosecutor for your district refuses to prosecute you have a right to bring this evidence to the grand jury for them to hand down an indictment. I suggest that you get someone knowledgeable in the law to assist you at this point. You can recover your losses, both monetary and mental suffering.Another View: First: Private citizens do NOT go directly to a state prosecutor and DEMAND that they bring criminal charges. A citizen can report an alleged offense to law enforcement who will investigate and render a judgment as to whether or not criminal law has been violated. If it has, LAW ENFORCEMENT will bring the case to the prosecutor who will then determine if sufficient evidence exists to prosecute under state law.Further: The above answer assumes that your complaint embodies a criminal element. In actuality, if you have any claim at all, it is most likely a civil matter rather than a criminal one. You will have to consult with a private attorney of your choosing to determine if enough of a case exists to bring suit against the bank.
Marriage counseling. Get a separate bank account. Get a divorce.
you can sue them
Yes, that is known as "Prosecutorial Discretion." Such decisons, if unpopular, can be a problem at election time, but it is legal.Additionally, I can't remember the case law names though, but the victim, has NO say constitutionally/legally on if a prosecutor refuses to charge or not.Added: Such a decision/determination is known in law as a Nolle Prosequi.I am not 100% certain about this, but I do not believe that a prosecutor has this option in a case where an indictment has been returned by a Grand Jury.
Not unless the attorney in the case is the prosecuting attorney (The State). Even then, a complainant may take the case to either another venue with jurisdiction, or to an higher prosecutor. However, charges are never dropped if a defense attorney refuses to take the case.
Your contract with the tradesman is between "You and the Contractor", He did not contract with your insurance company. All the insurance company did is agree to pay the bill for you. So you would need to bring your own civil or criminal action against your contractor depending on the circumstances.
In the UK there is no recourse available for an advertised price on a shop item, it is merely an offer. Though most shops would not purposely display an incorrect price. Other forms of shopping have different regulations. Distance buying for instance.
There are three methods by which cases can be "dropped."(1) Nolle Prosequi - by the prosecutor(2) Dismissal WITH Prejudice - by the judge(3) Dismissal WITHOUT Prejudice - by the judge.To answer specifically requires knowing which of these three ways was in effect.Regarding the arrest however - Unless it can be proven that the arresting officer was guilty of criminal malice (i.e.; false arrest) - if sufficient probable cause existed, and the arrest was conducted under legal guidelines, it does not affect the quality of the arrest that the case was later 'dropped.'Another View: The answer does not require knowledge of which method the case is dropped, because the victim has no rights, with one minor exception, in any of the methods.A criminal charge is one in which the State prosecutes a defendant on a charge of commission of a crime. The State is enforcing its law and public policy in order to preserve the peace. The State is represented by a prosecutor, district attorney or US Attorney or other similar official and is the only party permitted to act on behalf of the State. Victims have no right to represent the State and prosecute criminal charges except in some very limited situations. Therefore:If the State decides to drop charges or not to bring charges, or to bring lesser charges than the victims believes is warranted, the victim has no right to pick up where the State left off, because individual persons have no right to represent the State and prosecute crimes.If the court dismisses charges with prejudice, the State must take an appeal. If the States declines to appeal, the victim has no right to file the appeal, because the individual persons have no right to represent the State and prosecute crimes.If the court dismisses the charges without prejudice, the State may reinstate the charges, but if it declines to do so, the victim has no right to reinstate them himself, because individuals have no right to represent the State and prosecute crimes.The very minor and limited exception occurs when a State refuses to prosecute a minor offens ans state law specifically allows the victim to be a "private prosecutor." This is a practice that has virtually disappeared from criminal jurisprudence. It usually occurred when two people get into a fight then file complaints with the police for assault and battery chargers against one another. In some situations like that the facts are so muddled that the State has no idea which party to prosecute. And the charges are so minor that it is a waste of resources to prosecute either one of them. So the State steps aside and tells the two combatants to go ahead and knock yourselves out . . but in court this time.
When a person (generally a Filipino), buys a piece of property ( lot / land ) in the Philippines, but after completing the payments, the realtor refuses to give the person the title to the lot/ or refuses to return his/her money; what recourse does this person have? if she appeals to the goverment, wins the case, but the realtor still refuse to obey the government's decision, what is let for the person swindled has?