The amendment process allows people to rewrite it. As a result, it becomes a living document. Changes can be adopted as needed.
No, not ever. Many say that the Constitution is a "living, breathing" document, but it is not. On the other hand, there is a process through which a certain majority of States can ratify (approve) an addition to the Amendments to the Constitution.
The Constitution of the United States of America is not set in stone. It is constantly subject to subtle interpretive change by the courts and major change by the passage of amendments.
It's known as living , Because when can edit it , which are called Amendments .
It was important for the farmers to include a process for changing the Constitution to ensure that the document could adapt to evolving societal needs and circumstances. This flexibility allows for amendments to address new issues, reflect changing values, and improve governance. By incorporating a formal amendment process, they aimed to balance stability with the ability to reform and prevent stagnation, fostering a living document that can endure over time. This foresight helps maintain the Constitution's relevance and legitimacy in the eyes of future generations.
They wanted the Constitution to be a "living document" that could adapt to and address issues of a changing nation.
Everyone considers it a living document. It can be changed to fit the needs of the time through the amendment process and questions concerning constitutionality of laws are settled in the Supreme Court.
The framers of the Indian Constitution included provisions for amendments to ensure that the Constitution remains a living document, adaptable to changing social, political, and economic conditions. This flexibility allows for necessary updates and changes in response to the evolving needs of society while maintaining the foundational principles of democracy and justice. By allowing amendments, the framers aimed to balance stability with the capacity for reform, enabling the Constitution to endure over time.
living document
bill of right
because it is important to know who will be president when the actual presidnet dies.
Of course the statement "the constitution is a living document" is metaphorical, since no document is living, it's a piece of paper with writing on it. As a metaphor, this statement would suggest that the constitution remains relevant and connected to the society which it helped to establish in the late 18th century, which is a long time ago. If you think that the constitution has become irrelevant, then you would say that the constitution is not a living document. Personally I find it to still be relevant.
that the constitution would be a living, breathing document. ~Ham