No contest.
If the cops have concrete evidence of your violation, it's best to plead guilty in a sincere manner. Avoid transferring responsibility. As long as you show understanding of your violation and remorse for committing it, then you can generally plead guilty and get out of it by taking a driving course. Added: Before you plead anything to a traffic offense, you should check with your state's DMV for their point system. You will want to know how this offense will look on your record. Pleading guilty does not "get you out of it." Pleading guilty is accepting all consequences. Some courts will offer a reduction in exchange for driving school or other considerations, which may help keep your record clear. You should go to court or talk to a lawyer to find out if this is available, even if you are actually guilty.
if you are pleading not guilty you wish to fight the ruling i just went through this last month and i made the mistake of pleaing no contest and was found guilty before i could say another word
Firstly capital punishment or the death penalty should be banned therefore eliminating the death of those presumed 'innocent'. Further and extensive research of evidence and witnesses should be conducted. Those who are pleading guilty should not give up hope. Believe that police and investigators will find more evidence supporting the assumed and presumed innocent.
Guilty
No; once a guilty plea is entered, there is an acknowlegdment of guilt. If one is wrongfully arrested, there should not be a guilty plea because the facts of the case would be fruits of the poisonous tree in court therefore a conviction of guilt could not be reached because the evidence against the defendant is not admissable. Any good defense attorney would be able to argue a wrongful arrest in court which would either result in a not guilty verdict, dismissal, aquittal or a failure to prosecute.
They are two entirely different pleas. NOT GUILTY is as, the name implies, you are pleading that you did not do it. If you plead NO CONTEST (Nolo Contendre), it means that you don't deny the charge made against you, and concede that the prosecution probably has enough evidence to convict you. No contest is just a "kinder and gentler" way of pleading Guilty.One advantage to pleading nolo, or "no contest," is that that the defendant is not required to allocute, or explain any details or circumstances of the alleged crime, and the pleading can't be used to establish negligence per se, malice, or guilt on your part if the charges lead to someone filing a civil suit against you. A guilty plea can be used as the basis for civil action from a victim seeking monetary or other damages, whereas a "no contest" plea cannot. This does not mean it provides absolute protection against civil liability, but it does confer some benefits.As to whether you should, decide for yourself - with the advice of a lawyer - if they do have enough to prosecute you or not. You are fully entitled to hear the charges against you. If you are sure they do not have enough for a conviction, then plead not guilty. If you think they could pull it off or that they will probably get you, then plead no contest.As mentioned above, it would be wise to consult an attorney before taking further action.
TRUE statement. The actual distance is dictated by state law, which varies.
it should contain statement of comprehesive statement, statement of financial position and statement of cashflows
If I understand the question correctly - it sounds like the officer cut you a break by giving you a lesser charge. You know you were speeding 45 mph over the limit! 'Man up' and plead guilty, and if it's your first traffic offense, ask if you can attend traffic school instead of getting points.
They should be exonerated
When riding a bicycle, you should ride with traffic, not against it. This is safer and follows traffic laws.
Yes you should feel guilty about it. This is not a loyal thing to do.