A cause of action that typically involves a request for money damages is a tort claim. Torts arise from wrongful acts that cause harm or injury to another person, leading to civil liability. Common examples include negligence, defamation, and personal injury claims, where the injured party seeks financial compensation for their losses. Additionally, breach of contract claims can also involve requests for monetary damages to compensate for losses incurred due to the failure to fulfill contractual obligations.
It would be a civil suit, usually in tort, for damages.
such expungement action is usually done by an attorney through the court
Yes, a tort is a civil wrong that causes harm or loss to someone, leading to legal liability. It involves a claim for damages by the injured party against the person who committed the wrongful act.
it presents the tension the essential confusion of the story which usually involves key characters
Not usually. Civil law exists that an individual who has wrongly incurred damages might be made whole again. It doesn't exist to enrich people who have incurred no damages even if a technical wrong occurred.
"Intend to issue proceedings for civil damages against you" means that a party is planning to take legal action to seek compensation for harm or losses they believe you have caused. This typically involves filing a lawsuit in civil court to claim monetary damages. The notice serves as a warning that legal action is imminent unless the matter is resolved. It’s important to respond appropriately, often with legal counsel, to address the situation.
Civil is usually surrounding the plaintiff chasing some level of damages, financial or property. Criminal refers to an act of punishment for wrong doing be it time or work
Education involves mental action and sports involves physical action.
Monarch?
The term "motion case" usually refers to a legal procedure in which one party asks the court to make a decision or take action. It involves filing a motion with the court, outlining the request and supporting arguments. The court will then review the motion and may hold a hearing before making a decision.
Yes, objecting and refusing are different concepts. Objecting typically involves expressing disagreement or concern about something, often in a formal context, while refusing is a more definitive action of declining to accept or comply with a request or proposal. Objecting can lead to discussion or negotiation, whereas refusing is usually a final stance.
petition