Tennessee vs. Garner
The 8th Amendment, that which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.
Tennessee v. Garner
common law
If you mean Tennessee v. GaRner: Cops can't use deadly force in order to effectuate and arrest of an unarmed and non-dangerous fleeing felon.
Tennessee v. Garner
The Tennessee v. Garner case established that law enforcement officers cannot use deadly force against a fleeing suspect unless they have probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of serious physical harm to the officers or others. Whether this precedent applies to Rambeaux would depend on the specific circumstances of the situation, including the actions of Rambeaux and any perceived threats. If Rambeaux was fleeing and posed no immediate threat, then the principles from Garner could potentially apply. Ultimately, a legal analysis would be necessary to determine the relevance of the case to Rambeaux's situation.
The outcome of the Turner v Driver settlement was that the case was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount.
In the case Plumme v. State, the outcome was that the defendant was found guilty and convicted.
In the legal case Hermesmann v Seyrer, the outcome was that the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Hermesmann, and awarded damages for breach of contract.
In the legal case Simeone v. Lindsay, the outcome was that the court ruled in favor of the defendant, Lindsay.
the case was dismissed,