If there were no laws, the world would be a series of small villages ruled by warlords, constantly at war with one another. Total world population perhaps 100 million.we would be an oppressed nation. Countries under a Dictatorship (such as the Nazi regime) have been proven to be a failure. Freedom allows individuals to feel comfortable with having their own opinions and views on things.A lot of people would be busy getting in trouble. Humans are expressive species and if there were no freedom then the people are unable to express there views.
we have freedom
Freedom of expression and freedom of speech
we would die
You would die
you would blow up
Absolutely nothing, millions of people do. Freedom of expression and freedom of speech are basic human rights. Unless you live in a country ruled by tyranny then you'll probably be jailed.
what would happen if the 8th amendment didn't exist
So what if people never farted? Gas Would Build Up Internally Your intestines would swell from trapped gas. You’d feel bloating, pain, and cramping. In extreme cases: severe discomfort, difficulty breathing, and even pressure on internal organs. Burping Alone Wouldn't Fix It Burping only removes gas from the upper GI tract (like swallowed air), not the intestinal gas created by bacteria. No farting = no outlet for that lower gas. Risk of Medical Complications If someone couldn’t fart or release gas in any way, over time it could lead to: Intestinal obstruction Distention of the colon A rare but serious condition called bowel perforation (a tear in the intestine) Gut Health Would Suffer Farting is a sign your gut bacteria are doing their job digesting fiber and carbs. No farts might mean: Poor digestion A disrupted microbiome Risk of nutrient absorption issues Bottom Line: Farting is normal, healthy, and necessary. It might be embarrassing, but if we didn’t do it — the consequences would be painful and dangerous.
?
There are limits for freedom of speech as well as freedom of expression. These limits on freedom of expression are referred to as time, place, and manner restrictions. Therefore a law stating any one individual or organization can only contribute so much would still allow one to contribute but place an amount on it therefore it would not violate the freedom of expression but rather place a focus point on it.
Nothing would happen. You either believe in them or you don't!
we would be in slavery