When an employee creates a work in the course of their employment who first owned the copyright?

Who owns inventions created by company employees during the course of their employment?

employee

What are the rights of the creator of non-copyrighted material?

If material is not protected by copyright, the creator has no rights to it. For example, a person preparing a document in the course of his duties as an employee of the US Government has no rights to that document, because it is not protected by copyright in accordance with section 105 of the copyright code.

How can I copyright a training course?

To copyright a training course, you can simply create the course material and then register it with the U.S. Copyright Office. This will provide legal protection for your course content and prevent others from using it without your permission.

How do you copyright something in the UK?

Copyright is automatically assigned on creation of a work. There is no formal registration process. Copyright will belong to a company if a work is created by a person during company time and the course of their employment, otherwise the copyright automatically belongs to the person creating a work.

What is respondent superior?

Respondeat Superior rule states that Principle (Employer) is liable for all the unauthorized acts of the agent (employee) performed within the course of his employment.

What is HRM?

HRM may stand for HOTEL RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT or Human Resource Management.

What is the copyright for My Immortal by evanescence?

yes, of course

Would a company rehire an employee if they fired that employee?

An employer say you are still working for them after they have fired you only if they continue to pay you and there is a contract that limits your ability to obtain other employment for a time.

When is worker eligible to claim workmen's compensation?

By definition, a covered employee is entitled to workers compensation benefits if he/she was injured within the course and scope of employment. Fault by the employer is not an issue--it is a form of strict liability which, historically, was developed as an alternative to employees suing employers who may have been at fault. One of the primary exceptions to coverage (other than the injury not being within the course and scope of employment) is "horseplay". In general, this contemplates activities such as roughhousing--which is not considered to be within the course and scope of employment.

Is distance course is equivalent to a regular course for an govt employee?

no

Can you make an employee pay for negligence?

You can if you can get a court to grant a ruling in your favor. For which you need to question and prove certain thing like 1) Kind of negligence? 2) What sort of consequnce followed due to negligent act of employee? 3) Do the employee was acting in his authority and in course of employment? 4) Do any other act contributed or responsible for consequence?

Filing Lawsuits Dealing with At Will Employment Laws?

Unfortunately, many employees can be wronged by employers due to at will employment laws. Just because an employee was an at will employee does not mean that an employer has free reign to do whatever he or she wants. The truth is that an employee can truly get into legal trouble for taking advantage of employees using at will employment laws. This article will explain how employees can make arguments against employers, even when a case deals specifically with at will employment laws. First off, if there is a contract between an employee and an employer, there must be a form of consideration outlined within the contract. An employee must tender some sort of promise in exchange for a promise from the employer. Basically, there needs to be a benefit to one party and a detriment to another party. If a contract between these two parties does not have consideration, then there is no recourse for an employer to sue an employee. In addition, a contract between an at will employee and an employer must never be illusory. An employer can not lead an employee on into thinking that he or she will forever get to work at a place of employment. Often, employers will make grandiose promises to employees in an effort to get those employees to stay at a place of employment. Maybe the employer promises that the employee will someday become a manager of a store or receive a better compensation. If an employer leads an employee on into believing this, then the employer must truly abide by its promise. If an employer does not abide by its promise, then the employee will have a legal right to sue the employer to get compensation he or she was promised. At will employment laws have begun to favor employees more in recent years. At will employment laws have been interpreted more broadly by judges, so that employees have a better course of action against employers who may manipulate them or take advantage of them. Overall, it is a good idea for any employee to research at will employment laws and file cases against their employers if they feel they have been wronged.