No. Individuals are responsible for their own actions.
No.
YES!
Companies are always liable for the actions of their agents, unless the agent is acting outside his authority in a way that the company would not have been expected to notice.
Yes, the intruder is liable for his actions if he unlawfully entered a property or committed a crime while trespassing. This could result in legal consequences and potential charges.
Yes, I may be held liable for my actions
... is liable for any damage due to negligible actions...what is negligible actions in this sentence. it's from a product information.
No.
They bear no presumption of negligence and are only liable for the dollar value of the erroneous payment that is attributable to their actions.
The reverse piercing of the corporate veil is a legal concept that allows individuals to be held personally liable for the actions of a company. This can happen when the company is used to commit fraud or other wrongful acts. It impacts individuals involved in a company by exposing them to potential financial and legal consequences for the company's actions.
No, at age 19, the "child" is an adult responsible for his own actions. The parent has no legal authority to make the 19 year old do what the parent wishes, therefore the parent cannot be held liable for the child's actions.
Yes, individuals can be held criminally liable and potentially face jail time for negligence in certain situations, especially if their actions or inactions result in harm or injury to others.