civil law
Precedent
Judges can interpret the law in any way they choose. If they are elected they decisions may be skewed for political reasons
Judicial restraint
Following precedent or stare decisis.
The possessive form of the plural noun judges is judges'. Example: The judges' decisions are final.
cases
Judges who adhere closely to statutes and decisions in previous cases are said to exercise judicial restraint. This approach emphasizes the importance of following established law and precedent, ensuring consistency and predictability in legal outcomes. By limiting their own discretion, these judges aim to uphold the rule of law and respect the legislative intent behind statutes. This contrasts with judicial activism, where judges may interpret laws more broadly or adapt them to contemporary values.
Assign judges, interpret laws
golden rule
Judges who make decisions based on their moral preferences are often referred to as "activist judges." This term is used to describe those who interpret laws in a way that reflects their personal beliefs or values rather than strictly adhering to legal precedents or statutes. Such judicial activism can lead to significant changes in law and policy, often sparking debate about the role of personal morality in legal interpretation.
According to Judaism, the only Judges who achieved prophecy were Eli and Samuel, and possibly Gideon. See also:List of the Judges
No. They make decisions and some decisions are used to change law.