It should be "property vested in," as "vested in" indicates ownership or control being placed in something or someone, while "vested to" is not grammatically correct.
The man was vested in the company. Another good sentence would be, the new state law vested the criminals ownership.
Private ownership: Media companies are owned by individuals or small groups who control the content and operations of the outlets. Public ownership: Media outlets can be owned and operated by government bodies or agencies, with content often being influenced by political interests. Community ownership: Media ownership can be vested in the hands of local communities or non-profit organizations, ensuring that content reflects community values and interests.
Public ownership of most land is the idea that land and resources within a nation belong, ultimately, to the people of that nation. The property interests are vested in the state, rather than an individual or communities.
Vested shares are owned by an individual but may not be sold or transferred until a certain period of time has passed or specific conditions are met. Released shares are those that have met the requirements for ownership and can be freely sold or transferred.
The power vested in Harry in the movie Harry Potter. This is an example of vested in a sentence.
Vested means "held" and unvested means the opposite. ex: Here are the powers vested in congress;....
It means that what assets are in your pension account, they belong to you. All belong to you if you are 100% vested. Only half, if 50% vested.
Tagalog translation of VESTED: binigyan ng kapangyarihan
by the powers VESTED in me is correct.
Vested stock options are ones that you can exercise and buy stock with, while non-vested stock options cannot be used yet.
He became vested in the retirement account after five years. She had been vested with the responsibility to keep the fire burning.