the federal government could not force a state governor to return a fugitive
Until 1987, extradition cases were often governed by bilateral treaties and the legal frameworks of individual countries, leading to significant variations in how extradition was handled globally. Many countries required a dual criminality principle, meaning that the act for which extradition was sought had to be a crime in both the requesting and requested countries. Additionally, political offenses were frequently excluded from extradition agreements, complicating matters further. This landscape began to shift with the adoption of more standardized international agreements and protocols in subsequent years.
In general, posting bond on extradition is not typically allowed. Extradition is a legal process where a person is transferred from one jurisdiction to another to face criminal charges, and once the extradition process is initiated, the individual is usually held until the extradition is completed. However, some jurisdictions may allow for bail under specific circumstances, but this varies widely depending on the laws of the state or country involved. It's essential to consult legal counsel for specific cases and circumstances.
As of my last update, Angola does not have an extradition treaty with the United States. This means that the U.S. may face challenges in seeking the extradition of individuals from Angola who are wanted for prosecution or to serve sentences. However, extradition cases can still be negotiated on a case-by-case basis, depending on the circumstances involved.
Extradition decisions for state cases are typically made by the executive branch of government, often involving the governor or a designated state agency. The specific process may vary by state, but it generally includes a review of the legal grounds for extradition and any relevant treaties or agreements. Courts may also be involved if there are disputes or challenges regarding the extradition. Ultimately, the decision balances legal considerations with issues of justice and public policy.
Yes, Montenegro has extradition agreements with EU member states. As a candidate country for EU membership, Montenegro is aligned with EU legal standards, including those related to judicial cooperation and extradition. The country has also ratified various international treaties that facilitate extradition processes. However, specific extradition cases may depend on the legal circumstances and agreements in place with individual EU countries.
'Extradition' is a term describing the legal process by which a wanted individual is removed from the apprehending jurisdiction to face legal action for offenses he committed in another jurisdiction. (i.e.- you commit an offense in Texas but are arrested by Oklahoma - you are held in custody in Oklahoma until you either 'waive extradition' and voluntarily agree to return to Texas, or are held until Texas files extradition proceedings against you in Oklahoma's court system.)
I believe that the answer will be yes. All NATO nations subscribe to international extradition treaties with the only proviso being that some (but not all) would not allow extradition for any cases which could be punished by the death penalty.
Yes, the UK has an extradition agreement with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which includes Dubai. This agreement allows for the extradition of individuals wanted for prosecution or to serve a sentence in either country, subject to certain legal conditions and procedures. However, extradition cases can be complex and may involve legal challenges based on human rights concerns or other factors.
The purpose - is to recover a wanted criminal to the country asking for the extradition - so they can stand trial for their crimes.
Violent Cases was created in 1987.
One county within the same state will honor another county's arrest warrant and hold you until they come to transport you back to the county that wants you. The actual legal act defined as "extradition" doesn't come into play in INTRAstate removals. Extradition only applies to INTERstate removals.
There was no Dakota until 1987,There was no Dakota until 1987,