Sometimes either. A civil case may be tried in the state of the party filing suit, or a party can invoke federal diversity jurisdiction and remove the case to federal court if the amount of the claim is in excess of $75,000.
Federal cases involving citizens of different states are called "diversity" cases if that is the claimed basis for Federal court jurisdiction.
Federal courts hear cases with federal jurisdiction. Such jurisdiction comes if the case hears a question of federal law or if the case has diversity jurisdiction (parties are citizens of different states and minimum dollar amount is in dispute.)
Federal courts have jurisdiction over four main types of cases: cases involving federal law, cases involving the U.S. Constitution, cases in which the U.S. government is a party, and cases between citizens of different states (diversity jurisdiction) where the amount in controversy exceeds a specified threshold. These cases ensure that federal laws and constitutional rights are upheld uniformly across states. Additionally, federal courts may hear certain specialized cases, such as those involving maritime law or bankruptcy.
Under the Constitution, the federal courts have jurisdiction over a number of kinds of suits involving state citizens. Since Dred Scott's case involved citizens of different states, the chief justice could have said that free blacks in states that considered them citizens could bring certain cases into federal courts.
Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases where the parties are located in different states; and they have have jurisdiction over "federal questions" such as trademark law, which is regulated by the federal government, not the state; and Federal courts have jurisdiction over disputes between the states.
United States District Courts have original jurisdiction over cases involving federal crimes, civil suits under federal law, civil suits between citizens of different states, admiralty and maritime cases, bankruptcy cases, actions of certain federal administrative agencies, and other matters that may be assigned to them by Congress.
A: Only federal courts handle cases between citizens of different states
Federal diversity jurisdiction (diversity of citizenship) allows citizens of different states to file civil action against each other in federal court (instead of state court) under certain circumstances. Diversity jurisdiction may be invoked for civil cases involving claims in excess of $75,000.
Citizens of different states are equal under the law.
A diversity of citizens case is a lawsuit which does not involve any federal issues and would not normally be heard in the federal court, except that the case involves a certain amount of money and the parties are citizens of different states or countries. This jurisdiction was created in the federal courts to make sure that out of state parties who had to file their complaints and answers in state courts where they did not live were not discriminated against. Title 28 of the United States Code, Section 1332 states the requirement. Essentially, the requirements are that the amount in controversy must be over $75,000.00 and the parties are either 1. Citizens of different states; 2. Citizens of a state and of a foreign country; 3. Some combination of citizens of different states and citizens of foreign countries; 4. A foreign country as plaintiff and citizens of a state or states. It is not mandatory that such cases be heard in the federal District Court. Plaintiffs have the option to file a case there if they so desire. If the case is filed in a state court, the defendant may ask that the case be transferred to a federal court.
The Anti-Federalists wanted to protect citizens and the states against federal power.
Cases brought to federal courts typically involve questions of federal law, constitutional issues, or disputes between states or citizens of different states. Federal courts have jurisdiction over matters such as violations of federal statutes, treaties, and civil rights cases. Additionally, they handle cases involving maritime law and bankruptcy. Overall, federal courts address issues that require a uniform interpretation of federal law across the country.