0
Which group demanded a bill of rights should be added to the Constitution after it was ratified?
The Bill of Rights were introduced to Congress in 1789 by James Madison.
A group called the Anti-Federalists wanted to add the Bill of Rights to ensure that personal freedoms would be secure from the large National government that was being proposed.
The Bill of Rights contained ten guaranteed rights, most importantly was the freedom of speech, freedom the press, freedom of religion, the right to peacefully assemble and seek redress of grievances. This First Amendment also forbid the federal government to create any religions. the other nine amendments were also important. For example, in the 8th amendment, excessive bail was forbidden and cruel and unusual punishments for crimes was forbidden.
What else can I help you with?
What are the reasons why the constitution should be ratified?
The Constitution should be ratified because it establishes a framework for government, protects individual rights, and promotes unity among the states.
Are the constitution and Bill of Rights the same thing?
No, they are not. The Constitution is the main document that sets up the workings of the federal government. The Bill of Rights is an adjunct to the Constitution that makes clear that the federal government is either prohibited from restricting or mandated to provide certain rights to individuals and to states. Another distinguishing feature is that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were ratified at different times therefore for a brief period of time, the Constitution existed without the Bill of Rights. The Constitution was ratified by three fourths of the states on June 21, 1788. The Bill of Rights was ratified by three fourths of the states on December 15, 1791. The only sense in which they may be considered the same thing is that the Constitution cannot be read without taking into account the Bill of Rights, which represent changes to the Constitution. They are separate parts of a single working document.
Did James Madison promise that a bill of rights would be added to the constitution?
Answer It convinced people that the federal government would not be a crazy person
What were main argument for and against ratification of the constitution?
The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.
What is Letters of a Landholder?
A book written by oliver ellsworth about why the constitution should be ratified.
What did the Federalists propose that the Constitution should be ratified by rather than by the state legislatures?
Conventions, Not State LegislaturesThe Federalists proposed that the Constitution should be ratified by popularly elected conventions rather than by the state legislatures.
What were the main arguments for and against constitution?
The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.
The constitution should be ratified by popularly elected conventions rather than states legislatures?
True :)
Why was the 7th Amendment passed?
the trial of the case should be more than $20
Which founding father demanded the us constitution describe the rights of state's and individuals that the federal government should protect?
James Madison, often referred to as the "Father of the Constitution," was a key advocate for including a Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution. He believed it was essential to explicitly outline the rights of states and individuals to protect them from potential federal overreach. His efforts led to the adoption of the first ten amendments, which safeguard various individual liberties and state powers.
Is there a need for an amendment to the constitution protecting victims rights?
Should the Federal Constitution be amended to protect victims' rights
Which amendment says that rights in the Constitution should not be used to deny other rights?
The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that the enumeration of specific rights in the Constitution should not be interpreted to deny or disparage other rights retained by the people. This amendment emphasizes that individuals have additional rights beyond those explicitly listed in the Constitution.
