answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What agreement settled a dispute between Southern and Northern states at the Constitutional Convention?

The Three-Fifths Compromise settled the dispute between Southern and Northern states at the Constitutional Convention. It determined that enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of representation and taxation. This compromise helped to balance the interests of Southern states, which wanted to count enslaved people to increase their political power, with Northern states, which opposed such counting for representation.


What did northern an southern states disagree over the most at the Constitutional Convention?

The northern and southern states had two major disagreements at the convention. The North disagreed with the use of slaves, and the South disagreed how people were elected to office.


What was the three fifths comprimise?

The Three Fifths Compromise is one of the most controversial parts and outcomes of the Constitutional Convention. For the allocation of seats in the US House of Representatives, a black person counts for three fifths of a white person.


At the constitutional convention of 1787 the three fifths compromise and the great compromise dealt with the issue of?

The three-fifths compromise showcased the escalating divisions between Northern and Southern states. The issue was over how slaves would be counted for taxation and legislative purposes.


The Three-Fifths Compromise which was made at the Constitutional Convention represented differences of opinions over which issues?

The three-fifths compromise showcased the escalating divisions between Northern and Southern states. The issue was over how slaves would be counted for taxation and legislative purposes.


What issue was at the heart of one of the compromises made between northern and southern states during the Constitutional Convention of 1787?

There was a major disagreement between the states over representation in Congress.


What fraction of the slaves in a state were included when determining represantation in congress?

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a compromise reached between delegates from southern states and those from northern states during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The debate was over if, and if so, how, slaves would be counted when determining a state's total population for constitutional purposes.


Which compromises at the Constitutional Convention please the Southern states Why?

The Three-Fifths Compromise counted three-fifths of the state's slaves in apportioning Representatives. The compromise ended up giving the southern states 38 percent of the seats in the Continental Congress.


What three compromises about slavery kept southern delegates from walking out of the constitutional convention?

There was only one compromise regarding slavery and it was the three-fifths compromise which stated that slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of assigning House of Representative seats. Another compromise during the Constitutional convention was the Great compromise which created a bicameral legislature and the creation of the electoral college for Presidential elections.


How did the Constitution Convention Delegates resolve the issue of the southern representation in congress?

The Constitutional Convention delegates resolved the issue of Southern representation in Congress through the Three-Fifths Compromise. This agreement determined that for the purposes of representation and taxation, enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person. This compromise allowed Southern states to gain greater representation in the House of Representatives while acknowledging the contentious nature of slavery without directly addressing it. The compromise was pivotal in balancing the interests of both Northern and Southern states during the formation of the Constitution.


What did At the Constitutional Convention delegates from northern and southern states disagreed about?

D. whether the federal government should have the power to regulate slavery.


Who would bennefit the commerce compromise?

The Commerce Compromise, established during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, primarily benefited both the Northern and Southern states. Northern states, which were more industrialized and favored federal regulation of commerce, gained the ability to impose tariffs on imports. Meanwhile, Southern states, heavily reliant on agriculture and exports, were protected from export taxes and ensured that the federal government could not interfere with the slave trade for a set period. This compromise helped balance the interests of both regions, facilitating the ratification of the Constitution.

Trending Questions
Marriage? What law did Johnson violate that resulted in impeachment? Which popular Indian movie was based on the actual kidnapping incident of an Indian Oil? Does piracy still exist today? Can a bank freeze your account over a sworn affidavit from an individual statement? If you are living in a home with your parent who dies and there is a mortgage on the home does it have to be included in the probate of the estate. What are the ramifications of not doing so? What does Emerson paragraph mean in the context This is the best part of these men's farms yet to this their warranty deeds give no title? What does NCIC and or CIB mean in legal terms? Can you send a fax to NJ unemployment? What if there is still a bank loan on the property you are trying to file an adverse possession on.? Your cruise control on your Lincoln town car quit working after ford dealer did work to fix recall in 2008? What is pre contract of expenditure? What happens when you are caught downloading Illegal things? In Alabama can fathers sign over parental rights without an attorney? You f A payment was made for less than the total due for that month accepted recorded recipt was givin then the car was reposessed in less than 30 days after does that change the original contract? Do you have to evict a squatter or can you just throw them out? Just found a personal check for over 600 from a customer that is 3 years old can it still be cashed? Is it true that Fraud is defined as failure to use reasonable care in the performance of services? How long do you legally have to keep finanial papers? Can a creditor run after the personal assset of all partners in an event the partnership asset are not sufficient to pay partnership obligation?