answersLogoWhite

0

By definition a de minimus issue is one so small or of so little consequence that, in all probability it would not even be considered for legal or judicial action. If brought before a court a judge would make the decision and ruling of de mnimus.

Definition: "De minimus is a Latin term that means of no significance or not worthy of consideration. In legal terms, the consequences of an act in violation of a legal requirement may be considered so small that they don't justify pursuing legal action."

See below link:

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who bears onus of proof in criminal and civil cases?

In both cases, the moving party bears the burden of proof. In a criminal case, that is the government. In a civil case, that is the plaintiff.


Did burden of proof on the issue of causation rests on the prosecution?

No. The prosecution only has to prove that you COMMITTED the offense. The issue of WHY (the cause) you did it is not a prosecutorial responsibility.


What means that certifying officer bears the burden of proof in establishing there was no contributing fault or negligence?

presumption of negligence


What means a certifying officer bears the burden of proof in establishing there was no contributing fault or negligence?

presumption of negligence


What means that a certifying officer bears the burden of proof in establishing there was contributing fault or negligence?

presumption of negligence


When was The Burden of Proof created?

The Burden of Proof was created in 1990.


Does the defendant carry the burden of proof?

No. The plaintiff has the burden of proof.


What is highest burden of proof?

The highest burden of proof is "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt."


How many pages does The Burden of Proof have?

The Burden of Proof has 502 pages.


What term is correct bear the burden of proof or bare the burden of proof?

The correct phrase is "bear the burden" and that applies to the phrases built on that phrase as well, such as "bear the burden of proof".


The rhetorical device that unfairly places the onus of providing evidence for a position on the wrong side of an issue?

Burden of proof


What is a rhetorical device that unfairly places the onus of providing evidence for a position on the wrong side of an issue?

A rhetorical device that unfairly places the onus of providing evidence for a position on the wrong side of an issue is called burden of proof. The burden of proof is on the person who is making the contention and attempting to prove something.