By definition a de minimus issue is one so small or of so little consequence that, in all probability it would not even be considered for legal or judicial action. If brought before a court a judge would make the decision and ruling of de mnimus.
Definition: "De minimus is a Latin term that means of no significance or not worthy of consideration. In legal terms, the consequences of an act in violation of a legal requirement may be considered so small that they don't justify pursuing legal action."
See below link:
In both cases, the moving party bears the burden of proof. In a criminal case, that is the government. In a civil case, that is the plaintiff.
No. The prosecution only has to prove that you COMMITTED the offense. The issue of WHY (the cause) you did it is not a prosecutorial responsibility.
presumption of negligence
presumption of negligence
presumption of negligence
The Burden of Proof was created in 1990.
No. The plaintiff has the burden of proof.
The highest burden of proof is "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt."
The Burden of Proof has 502 pages.
The correct phrase is "bear the burden" and that applies to the phrases built on that phrase as well, such as "bear the burden of proof".
Burden of proof
A rhetorical device that unfairly places the onus of providing evidence for a position on the wrong side of an issue is called burden of proof. The burden of proof is on the person who is making the contention and attempting to prove something.