The prosecution cannot call witnesses after it closes its case (prima-facie break), it can only cross-examine witnesses called by the defense. If the proseution attempts to call a witness not on its witness list before it closes its case, the defense should object. Basic court procedure means that the Prosecution must go first and show its case, then close its case, and then it is the defense's turn; the question as presented is a violation of the normal procedures used in court.
direct examination vevablunt
(in the US) The prosecution presents its case first.
Prosecution gets to close their case first, and defense gets the last word
After giving their opening statements in court, lawyers present evidence to support their case through witness testimony, exhibits, and other relevant materials. They may also challenge the other party's evidence through cross-examination and objections. Additionally, they may make legal arguments based on the evidence presented.
The state prosecutes its case and the defence then answers.
The prosecutor makes the first opening statement. The defense follows with its opening statement after the prosecution states its case.
You can refer to the judge as Judge or Your Honor. You would start by greeting them and then you speak in the third person if you are the defendant representing yourself. "Good morning Your Honor," The defendant in this case is charged with (insert crime here). The defense will attempt to show that: (and you put your strategy here.) Keep in mind that you dont have to give an opening statement. In most cases before a judge, the prosecution waives the statement and the defense follows with no statement. The judge then informs the prosecution that they can proceed to call their first witness. KEEP IN MIND THAT YOU CAN ONLY ASK QUESTIONS! When you are allowed to cross examine, you must only ask questions!! IF you make one statement to the witness, the prosecution will object and you will be over ruled and you risk making the case weak.
No. Intent is a strong case for the PROSECUTION of the charge. If the prosecution can prove motive, intent, and ooporunity they've practically got you convicted of first degree (pre-meditated) muirder.
The defendant in a criminal case is not required to prove innocence. The prosecution is required to prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The plaintiff/prosecutor speaks first, usually summarizing the evidence that has been presented, and highlighting items most beneficial to the prosecution. The attorney for the defendant speaks next.
The plaintiff - their legal representative outlines the case for the prosecution. It's then up to the defence barrister to answer the allegations on behalf of the defendant.
During opening arguments the prosecution presents theirs first, they will explain to a jury all of the circumstances of the case and explain what they will present to prove all of the evidence along with the type of testimony for the jury/judge to expect from any scheduled witnesses. The defense can present an opening argument at that time or they can reserve the option until after the prosecution presents their case. If the defense chooses to proceed with the opening they will explain why the Prosecutions case will be flawed, and what witnesses the defense will present to rebut the testimony of the prosecution witnesses.