Only congress can.
the F.O.O.P. branch can reject treaties. they are an underground brach that no on ever considers at first glance, but they control all of the other branches secretly.
Only Congress.
yes, I think so.
According the United States Constitution, the US Senate can refuse the president's appointments. It can also reject treaties that have been agreed to by the president.
The legislative branch, specifically the Senate in the United States, has the authority to reject treaties. According to the U.S. Constitution, a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate is required for a treaty to be ratified. If the Senate does not approve a treaty, it cannot be enacted, effectively rejecting it. This role ensures that treaties receive significant scrutiny before becoming binding agreements.
Congress can impeach a president (accuse them of a crime), override the president's veto power, and reject his or her treaties.
They must meet with the other countries, work out the details and agree to it, finalize the treaty into a bill of sorts, and the Senate must confirm it with a vote of 2/3. Pretty cut-and-dry.
no
The president makes treaties "by and with the Advice and consent of the Senate,...provided two thirds of the Senators present concur." The Senate may accept or reject treaty as it stands, or it may decide to offer amendments, reservations, or understandings to it.
Legislative over the execitive
true
The Senate is responsible for either approving of a treaty or rejecting it.