was a student at hazelwood high school her name was Catherine.
in 1988
what is this about
the first amendment
a student and the principal of the school
Arno Kuhlmeier has written: 'Die Betriebstypeninnovation als Bestandteil der Absatzpolitik im Einzelhandel' -- subject(s): Management, Marketing, Retail trade
i dont realy no
The court encouraged students to write appropriate articles.
You can likely find the Kuhlmeier article, which covers the rights of student journalism, in libraries, online archives, or through academic databases. It may also be available in collections discussing freedom of speech or student press rights.
Google the following cases for a good overview of these issues: Tinker v. Des Moines Bethel v. Fraser Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
The Supreme Court case that allowed schools to censor newspapers is Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988). The court ruled that school administrations have the authority to exercise reasonable control over school-sponsored publications if they are part of the school curriculum and can be reasonably viewed as educational tools. This decision limited the First Amendment rights of student journalists in public schools.
The Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier case was decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1988, ruling in favor of the Hazelwood School District. The Court determined that school officials had the right to exercise editorial control over student publications and could limit content if it was deemed inappropriate or inconsistent with the school's educational mission. This decision upheld the authority of schools to regulate student speech in certain contexts, particularly in school-sponsored activities.
In the case of the Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the students of Hazelwood High School that were publishing a school-wide newspaper were subject to reviews and edits by public school officials. In other words, Principal Robert Reynolds had the right to omit the two pages from the newspaper that he deemed to be inappropriate for the school to view. The individual rights of Freedom of Speech of the students in the journalism class were not violated as forums for student expression were of a lower level of First Amendment protection than the protection of individual students and staff. Also because the newspaper was school-sponsored, those participating in it were subject to obligations by the sponsor (in this case Principal Robert Reynolds).