The landmark case of In re Gault (1967) set a significant precedent by establishing that juveniles have the right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. This decision affirmed that minors facing delinquency proceedings are entitled to the same legal protections as adults, including the right to counsel, the right to confront witnesses, and the right to remain silent. The Court's ruling emphasized the importance of fair legal representation and the protection of individual rights within the juvenile justice system.
The Kalamazoo Case of 1874 set a precedent that taxing citizens for secondary education (post elementary school) was legal.
Miranda v Arizona was the case that set the precedent that verbal warnings must be given to a suspect during arrest.
A precedent is when the outcome of a case helps set the rules for future cases. A judge doesnâ??t have to use a precedent in the ruling, but precedents can be used to predict how a case will turn out.
Precedent
I really dont know what this is
that all ballsacks are to be round
precedent
John Marshall managed to set the principle of judicial review.
The landmark case that set a precedent for identifying a class of fundamental personal rights is Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). This case established the right to privacy as a fundamental right, extending protections to activities such as marital privacy and contraception. The ruling in Griswold laid the foundation for future cases involving personal autonomy and privacy rights.
A precedent is a case that set the basis for any later case to be judged on, if it has the same principles. This is so cases of the same type may get the same outcome, depending on the circumstances.
In Re Gault, 387 US 1 (1967)In Re Gault, (1967) is the landmark Supreme Court case that determined juvenile offenders had the same Due Process rights as adults.The Chief Justice in Gault was Earl Warren (1953-1969). Justice Abe Fortas wrote the opinion of the Court.
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)