Federalists opposed the Bill of Rights primarily because they believed that it was unnecessary in a government of limited powers. They argued that since the Constitution only granted the federal government specific authorities, it could not infringe on rights that were not explicitly mentioned. Additionally, they feared that enumerating certain rights might imply that any unlisted rights were not protected, potentially endangering individual liberties. Ultimately, they believed that the Constitution itself was sufficient to safeguard freedoms.
they didnt they didnt
The Bill of Rights
Yes the federalist wanted the Constitution for the new government and congress but the Anti-federalist did not agree because they taught the would not have enough rights and the same cycle would come again as a dictation or a king .The federalist accepted to put in the bill of rights to shut up the anti-federalist and sign now a day The U.S.constituion
Because they brought the Bill of Rights into it which made them happy and they agreed to ratify it.
So the anti federalists would ratify the Constitution :)(to gain the support of the Anti-Federalists)
The Federalist
It lacked the Bill of Rights
the anti-federalists were against the constitution and for them to agree with the federalist the federalists needed to add a bill of rights so the anti-federalists could agree with the philadelphia constitution
They wanted a Bill of Rights, guaranteeing personal rights to the citizens (speech, religion, etc.). See Wikipedia search: 'Bill of Rights'.
The Anti-Federalist advocated for the Bill of Rights. The Federalist were against including a bill of rights until Jefferson convinced Madison that "half a loaf is better than no bread".
No he did not he was a Federalist, The Anti-Federalist wanted the Bill of Rights
The federalist objected to the Bill of Rights because they believed it gave the government enough power, but not to much to prevent tyranny.