Some people only limit themselves by what is legal and what is illegal, and haven't moved to a higher stage of Moral development (referring to the research of Lawrence Kohlberg). In order to keep people at that level in check, we need laws.
The rules also keep things working, and usually actually *grant* us freedom when we follow them. (For instance, a driver's license typically grants us the freedom to use the public roads and to be relatively safe. If there were no laws about driving, it would be much more dangerous or costly.)
On the other end of the spectrum, at a higher level some people are going to realize that sometimes, rules need to be broken. At that level, we still have to have laws and consequences so people can measure whether breaking a law is worth it, and choose how to behave at that point, even from a moral perspective.
For instance, when people decided to rebel, declare independence, and establish the United States, they had to know the consequences and the legal situation, and know that they were choosing to take that extreme step for a cause that they believed in. The same with choosing a front seat on the bus despite the race rule of having to sit in the back, or smuggling escaped slaves, or hiding Jewish people from the Holocaust. There are some rules that must be broken, but we can't make those choices lightly. So, we have to look at the benefits of the law and the consequences of breaking the law (for everyone, not just ourselves), and when there are laws in place that are harming us as a society, then we can examine them and decide when to break them.
i dont know the answer
the history of the organized laws, rules, and regulations of societies. A+
the history of the organized laws, rules, and regulations of societies. A+
non-civilized societies have no rules to abide by, so anyone can basically do anything. In a civilized society, there are laws and punishments to keep people in order.
http://web.mit.edu/~ssilbey/www/pdf/law_society.pdf
How Native American societies were structured depended on the tribe. However, most of them had chiefs, a council, and a system of oral laws.
The relationship between God and human beings is just like a relationship between a scientist and his robots. God must have planned to create advanced creatures than his previous creatures (animals). He must have got the idea of creating human with sixth sense. After creating the human beings, God might have thought that he had entangled himself in a great responsibility. After watching the humans' lives He must have got the idea of creating moral and justice for the sake of human kind. Thus the humans' lives have changed while the animals' lives continued in the same way. I guess that it is very difficult to God to make changes among His previous creatures. He has to do lot more things in this world. He has to destroy all poisonous creatures and carnivorous animals. God loves human beings more than any other creature of this earth. He is fulfilling the needs of the human beings one by one but His attention didn’t go by the side of the animals. Humans’ thoughts, talks and writings may do something in God’s mind. I think He is thinking.
they both shared the same laws
Very simple. Workers got hurt and died, so laws were passed to prevent this from happening.
Egypt written laws novanet Egypt=- written laws
In some states yes they do.
political science