All terrorist attacks done by Muslims were condemned by all Islamic organizations, countries, and people.
However, just one comment. I wonder why when a terrorist act done by a Muslim is attributed to Islam religion while when the same is carried out by a Christian or a Jewish or a non Muslim it is attributed to his/her nationality and not to his/her religion. In my opinion it is the bias of western media against Islam and Muslims. Refer to questions below.
Some say that it is proven fact that the Quran teaches Muslims to hate non Muslims. This is not the truth. The Koran teaches love for Allah and all his people, not hate or terrorism. See the related links below for more information.
Simply put, while people certainly do ask about other forms of terrorism in addition to Islamic terrorism, people ask about Islamic terrorism for several major reasons: (1) its relative commonness, (2) the amount of media coverage given to Islamic terrorism, (3) a curiosity to understand the enemy, (4) selective attention making Muslims feel more under attack (Muslims typically are not reading questions about Hindu Terrorism), and (5) a general annoyance that most Muslims do not say anything useful concerning terrorism or why it occurs in Islam. They often prefer to use tu quoque logical fallacies (which is the fallacy of "you are just a bad as us"), no true Scotsman logical fallacies (which is the fallacy or "they are not 'real' Muslims"), and arguments that "non-Muslims just do not understand" while not explaining anything that would actually provide such understanding.
They started not to like terrorist even more and racism became more intense on Muslims -_- I really don't know just guessing
The analogy of attack and defend as condemn is to criticize. Both pairs involve opposing actions or responses, with attack and condemn being more forceful and aggressive, while defend and criticize involve protecting or evaluating something with a more nuanced approach.
If anyone knew when or where it would happen, then it wouldn't BE terrorism any more, would it?
There are hudnreds of ways in which terrorism effect the police, fistly, police have to get much more training now and they will be told what to do in certain eventualities, police get more powers when it comes to terrorism. This means spending more money and the governmenet allocating the police more funding.
Muslims :)
If you give terrorists what they want, you will prove that terrorism is a successful strategy and you will encourage others to also use terrorism to get what they want. The more that terrorism is rewarded, the more terrorism we will get. Much the same principle applies in dealing with kidnappers. You can pay them off to get them to release their victims, but that will just encourage them to keep kidnapping more people and collecting more ransoms indefinitely.
No, there are more Muslims living in Europe than there are Jews.
This is difficult to answer but many people misunderstand the Qur'an. Many people believe that because of all the terrorism acts and wars that all Muslims are trying to wipe out other religions. This is NOT true! Many Muslims are pleasant and believe in peace but only a small minority believe that terrorism is right. They believe this because in the Qur'an it tells you to defend your culture and some take this the wrong way. If the religion is explored many people will find that the religion is very peaceful and understand it more. :)
There are more Sunni Muslims than Shiite Muslims. Shiite Muslims represent about 15% of the global Islamic community whereas Sunni Muslims represent 85%. The numbers of the other sects are negligible.
stop terrorism