Why is the common law inferior and less comprehensive?

Answer 1

Common law can be considered inferior and less comprehensive because it relies heavily on case precedents, which can lead to inconsistencies and varying interpretations over time. Additionally, its evolution is often slow, as changes depend on judicial decisions rather than being codified through statutes. This can result in gaps in the law where specific scenarios may not be adequately addressed. Furthermore, common law may lack the systematic organization and clarity found in codified systems, making it less accessible to the public.

Answer 2

Common law can be seen as inferior and less comprehensive because it relies heavily on judicial precedents and case law, which can lead to inconsistencies and a lack of uniformity in legal interpretations. Additionally, common law evolves gradually, which may result in outdated or inadequate responses to contemporary issues. In contrast, civil law systems, which are codified, provide clearer guidelines and more comprehensive legal frameworks that can adapt more readily to societal changes. This can limit the common law's ability to address complex legal matters effectively.