to split the votes
to split the conversation with rebpublicans and democratics....and do the democractic can win the votes.
It's easier to remember.
If a state is considered aas hopeless, a candidate might not campaign there. If victory seems certain in a state, the candidate might also skip that state, but would probably make a token appearance or two to avoid offending anyone or to help Congressional candidates win.
The National Organization for Human Services and the World Health OrganizationÊare two organizations related to the human services field. If you worked in human services, joining the National Organization for Human Services would be recommended since you would have many opportunities to expand your career connections. You might not choose to join the World Health Organization because you are not in the medical field or you are not interested in health topics.Ê
A sponsored candidate is an individual who is backed by an organization or entity, often in the context of job recruitment or political campaigns. In employment, this typically refers to a candidate whose visa or work authorization is supported by a company, allowing them to work in a different country. In politics, it can refer to a candidate endorsed and financially supported by a political party or group. Sponsorship often provides candidates with resources, visibility, and opportunities they might not have otherwise.
You might call such a person a favorite son, although that term is usually used at nominating conventions for a person who is very popular in his own state but seems to lack national appeal.
A third party candidate might win presidency because in this system, rather than voting for one and only one candidate, you can vote for as many candidates as you want.
A third party candidate might win presidency because in this system, rather than voting for one and only one candidate, you can vote for as many candidates as you want.
No, it is not. "Candidate" is a noun. Adjectives are words that describe nouns. For example, we might describe a candidate using the adjectives 'eligible', 'potential' or 'feasible'.
Usually he chooses someone who he believes will help him get elected, He looks for someone who is very popular in areas where the president is not so popular. They call this strategy "balancing the ticket". The "areas" spoken of may be ideological (for example: an extremely conservative or liberal presidential candidate might want a more moderate running mate, or vice versa) or geographical: in the 1960 election, just to choose one example, Kennedy (from New England) chose Johnson (from Texas) as his running mate, and Nixon (a Californian) chose Lodge (from Massachusetts) in the hopes of blunting Kennedy's appear in that state and the northeast generally. It's also often true that older candidates frequently choose relatively young running mates (as happened with, among others, George Bush/Dan Quayle) while younger candidates frequently select older and more experienced running mates (George W. Bush/Dick Cheney).
Majority
In a job interview, you might be asked why you would be an excellent candidate for this position. You can answer with your strong points.