0
Juvenile offenders should generally not receive life sentences without the possibility of parole, as research indicates that adolescents have a greater capacity for rehabilitation and change compared to adults. Imposing such severe penalties overlooks the developmental differences and potential for growth in young people. Furthermore, life sentences can be seen as a violation of human rights, as they deny juveniles the opportunity to reform and reintegrate into society. Instead, alternatives focused on rehabilitation and support should be prioritized.
What else can I help you with?
Juvenile offenders should not be penalized?
yes
Should there be mandatory incarceration for chronic juvenile offenders?
For CHRONIC repeat offenders, yes.
How should juvenile offenders be treated in American society?
Juvenile offenders should be treated with a focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment. They should have access to education, mental health services, and support systems to help them reintegrate into society. Restorative justice practices can also be effective in holding them accountable while addressing the underlying causes of their behavior.
Who created the juvenile justice system?
The juvenile justice system was created by reformers in the 19th century who believed that young offenders should be treated differently than adult criminals. One influential figure in this movement was reformer Lyman Beecher, who advocated for separate courts and facilities for youth offenders.
Should status offenders be treated differently than juvenile delinquents?
There is no comparison to be made. Juveniles are juveniles and the law says they should be treated differently from adults, regardless of the charge against them.
What are the differences concerning how the juvenile justice system should operate according to the traditional and the punitive models?
The traditional juvenile justice system focuses on rehabilitation and treatment for juvenile offenders, emphasizing their welfare and best interests. In contrast, the punitive model prioritizes punishment and accountability, treating juvenile offenders more like adult criminals. The traditional model aims to address the underlying causes of delinquent behavior and promote positive youth development, while the punitive model emphasizes deterrence and retribution.
Why should the juvenile court not punish children?
If the juvenile has simply gotten into trouble as a repeat runaway; into trouble without harming other people and the juvenile has remorse then the courts should not punish the juvenile, but they could use 'house arrest' or a parole officer to contain the actions of juvenile if they continue to get into trouble. If the juvenile has committed a serious crime such as murder then they should be held in a Juvenile facility until they are old enough to go to court for that murder and should receive the punishment in accordance to that State's law.
Should Juvenile delinquency be mixed with the adult criminal in prison cells?
it depends on there age like if the were sixteen the maybe yes but otherwise no because the would by tiny compared to adult offenders
Is the sentence Repeat offenders will be given alternate assignments appropriate for their situation correct the way it is?
Yes, although maybe it should be 'alternative assignments'
What is Ca penal code 707b?
California Penal Code Section 707(b) pertains to the sentencing of juveniles who have committed certain serious offenses. It allows the court to impose a sentence that includes confinement in a juvenile facility, but emphasizes rehabilitation over punishment. This section is part of efforts to address juvenile delinquency while considering the developmental differences between minors and adults. The law reflects the belief that young offenders should have opportunities for reform.
Should felony offenders be in rehabilitation?
yea!
How are offenders treated?
All should be treated as innocent til found guilty and sentenced. Then all the same type of offenders should be treated equally.
