US supream court deemed the "Lie detector" test inadmissable as evidence because it isn't an exact science. It is unreliable and can false-test positive even when no one is connected to it.
hearsay
he will not submitt to one because he is busy doing the lord's work and does not need a polygraph to support his testimony of the truth.
Yes. Person A is an 'eye-witness'. His testimony is admissible as evidence because he was present when person B assaulted person C.
A lie detector test, or polygraph, is generally not admissible as evidence in court, including divorce proceedings. While one spouse may suggest using a polygraph to resolve disputes over trust or fidelity, the results are often considered unreliable and may not hold legal weight. It's usually more effective to rely on other forms of evidence or testimony during a divorce. Ultimately, the decision to use a lie detector is at the discretion of the parties involved and should be approached with caution.
A trial cannot be dismissed. A case can be dismissed before it goes to trial. A judge can allow testimony if it is within the bounds of admissible evidence, regardless of whether or not that evidence was presented at a prior hearing or trial.
The first thing that jumps to everyone's mind is so-called HEARSAY TESTIMONY. However, in actual fact there are many examples of hearsay customarily being admitted via court-sanctioned exceptions.
No, hearsay is not admissible in any court case unless it falls under one of 18 exceptions. These exceptions are thought to remove the problems of hearsay testimony.
The polygraph is sometimes useful to develop leads. Verify statements and crosscheck information. Moreover, it provides the police with a psychological advantage that may lead to a confession. Such confessions are admissible in court even though the test results are not. The proper tests are then determined, and the questions prepare and reviewed with the subject. After the test is completed, the subject and the police advised of the results in person or by letter. If the test indicates deception, an individual interrogation may follow. Any confessions that follow from such tests are almost universally accepted by the courts. The examiner's testimony is not conclusive evidence but rather opinion evidence regarding either guilt or innocence.
Sir, From the Indian Criminal Justice System Point of view, Reports of the officers envisaged under section 293(4) are admissible without cross examination along with any forensic or ballistic report by any government lab, as per judgement by the Hon'ble SC in H.P v. Mastram (2004) SCC, i dont remember the exact judgement though. _________________________ In most jurisdictions in the US, expert testimony is only admissible if both parties are given the opportunity to examine the expert witness, and thus only live testimony could be admitted.
It was silly for Alice to be called as a witness because she was not present at the event in question and therefore would not have firsthand knowledge to provide relevant testimony. Additionally, her testimony would likely be hearsay and not admissible in court.
Grand jury testimony is generally protected by secrecy, meaning that it cannot be used directly in civil court. However, if a witness voluntarily discloses their grand jury testimony outside of the grand jury proceedings, that information may be admissible in civil court. Additionally, if the testimony relates to issues in a civil case, it could potentially influence the proceedings indirectly. Ultimately, the specifics can vary based on jurisdiction and the circumstances of the case.
An admissible statement refers to a declaration or assertion that can be considered valid and acceptable within a specific context, such as legal proceedings or logical arguments. In legal contexts, it often pertains to evidence or testimony that meets certain criteria for relevance and reliability, allowing it to be introduced in court. In logic, an admissible statement is one that does not lead to contradictions within a given system. Overall, the term emphasizes the criteria that determine whether a statement can be appropriately accepted or used in a particular scenario.