0
Under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, 1984, an arresting officer in the UK has to caution the suspect that anything they say may be taken as evidence and used against them in the court of law. This means they have the right to remain silent and not incriminate themselves. However under certain circumstances (such as an extremely drunk or violent suspect) this caution does not have to be given straight away, but must be done so before the detainee is interviewed.
Added: (in the US) In conformance with the rulings emanating from the US Supreme Court ruling in 'Miranda v. Arizona,' when the questioning of a suspect not in custody passes from the 'fact-finding' stage and reaches the 'accusatory' stage, it is required.
For an actual arrestee - although they are usuallyinformed of their "Miranda rights" as soon as is practicable after they are placed under arrest, it is not required by law until the custodial questioning about their alleged offense actually begins.
It is not unusual for an arrestee to be 'advised' several times (i.e.: at the time of their arrest, usually by the arresting officer), as well as once again (by investigators) prior to the beginning of their actual questioning.
What else can I help you with?
What rights did people have in jesus's time?
As that area was under the Roman power they were under their rule and harsh treatments.
What were the rights of the colonists under the rule by the House of Burgesses?
They allowed them to choose their representatives.
Why you join the police?
I want to join the police,becose i have passion to help the needy peoples and give them protection under the rule and regulation.
Were individual rights more secure under the Articles of the Confederation than British rule?
Yes, because you could actually use your rights under the articles of confederation but with bristish rule you couldnt. Like as in freedom of speech you may use it in the Usa but you couldnt under bristish rule, well at least not all the time
Under the social contract theory how do leaders gain the rights to rule?
They are elected by the people
Are statements made by suspects under coercion admissible as evidence?
As a general rule, no, they are not. HOWEVER, 'coercion' needs to be further defined to know whether or not it meets the legal threshhold.
What is the rule of law in the case Arizona v hicks?
innocent.. under judge. rights violated
Why is Winston afraid Who does he see?
Winston is afraid because he realizes that he is being watched by the Thought Police, a secret and powerful government organization that monitors and punishes citizens for thoughtcrime. Winston's fear deepens when he sees a dark-haired girl who he suspects is a member of the Thought Police.
Can evidence illegally seized by the police be used in a trial?
No, evidence illegally seized by the police cannot be used in a trial due to the exclusionary rule, which prohibits the use of evidence obtained in violation of a person's constitutional rights.
What are The women rights in early Mexican rule?
what are the women's rights during Mexican rule
What century did the roman empire reach it's peak?
In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.In the second century under the rule of Trajan.
How does the US Supreme Court affect the rights of citizens?
It affects citizens because you all live under these rights and they are there to protect your human and democratic rights so if they rule whatever changed they can affect the way you live and your rights.
