There are no accurate figures because not all cases are reported.
However the most "brutal" police forces are known to be:
The arguments against police brutality are generally of three types. 1) The police job is to enforce the law and bring the perpetrator to justice...not to assume guilt or innocence. 2) The police look bad when they use police brutality. If is a poor role model for behavior. People can think, well..if the police can beat people up, why can't I? 3) Most important it sends a terrible message to others about the credibility (believability) of the system or state which allows police brutality to happen. Therefore, if police brutality becomes acceptable in a place, over time the public becomes aware of this and ends up ostracizing (avoiding) the state or area in which this occurs.Eventually the public trust in the legal system is undermined when police brutality is allowed to continue.
off camera
Police brutality has been reported to have increased since the 9/11 attacks, but there are no published statistics on the frequency of police brutality actions.
There can be no justification for brutality. The job of the police is to protect and defend.
Collective Opposed to Police Brutality was created in 1995.
No-one should "do" police brutality, that's why it's called brutality rather than reasonable force, which is what police officers should use.
Shailendra Misra has written: 'Police Brutality' -- subject(s): Police brutality
The Fourth Amendment, because it has to do with searched and seizures, as well as potential police brutality.
decades
Yes.
Your question cannot be answered. Police brutality in the US is both a crime and a civil rights violation. There is no 'use' for it.
bananas