answersLogoWhite

0

According to the decision, slaves were considered property, not people.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

The dred Scott decision stated that slaves?

the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee


What decision declared that slaves could not be taken from their masters?

The Dred Scott decision


What was stated in the dred scott decision?

Slaves were the property of their owners.


What document states that slaves are not citizens?

The dred scott decision


Why did the Dred Scott decision alarm Northerners?

The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.


What was John C Breckinridge platform?

He stood for the Dred Scott Decision (for slaves).


What did the Dred Scott Decision say about the condition of slaves in the?

we should all be the same


What was one of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision Slaves were citizens. Slaves were property. Slavery was illegal. Slavery was a choice each state could make.?

One of the findings of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision was that slaves were considered property, not citizens.


Who supported the Dred Scott decision?

the south because the case said that slaves were definitly not citizens


How did the northerners and southerners react to the Dred Scott decision?

Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.


How did the south feel about the dred Scott decision?

The South generally supported the Dred Scott decision because it upheld the rights of slaveowners to take their slaves into any territory. They saw it as a victory for states' rights and slaveholding interests.


What was a result of the Dred Scott decision?

Slaves were blocked from bringing lawsuits in courts because they weren't citizens.