Different court systems may have different ways of handling this situation, and I will answer ONLY from MY experience. All jurors are asked the same basic questions and all must answer them. Based on certain responses jurors may make on their juror questionnaire, they may be asked additional questions based on those responses. If they don't wish to answer a specific question in open voir dire (in front of the entire jury pool), they may request permission to approach the bench (judge) and answer that question only to the judge (of course it is required that the attorneys for both sides and the court stenographer will also be a party to the conference).
In some jurisdictions, prospective jurors can refuse to answer questions if they believe their response could infringe on their privacy or lead to prejudice. However, jurors must typically answer questions relevant to their ability to be impartial in the case.
A petit jury, which is the regular jury that listens to testimony and renders a verdict in a trial, is subjected to voir dire. This process involves questioning potential jurors to ensure impartiality and suitability to serve on the jury.
Jury members can be challenged to ensure a fair and impartial trial. Challenges allow both the prosecution and defense to eliminate potential jurors who may have biases or conflicts of interest that could impact their ability to be objective during the trial. By allowing challenges, the court aims to select a jury that can fairly evaluate the evidence presented.
Qualifications for jury duty typically include being a U.S. citizen, 18 years or older, proficient in English, possessing no disqualifying mental or physical conditions, and having no felony convictions. Additionally, jurors should have a clean criminal record and be able to attend court for the required period of time.
Le mot "laws" signifie "lois" en français. Il fait référence aux règles établies par un gouvernement ou une autorité pour régir la conduite et les interactions des individus dans une société donnée.
If you reside in a state where the juror pool is drawn from the Motor Vehicle records this could be a factor in your being summoned for jury duty. However in a state where the juror pool is taken from the pool of registered voters this would not occur. If you are drawn form the DMV records you can advise the court of your citizenship status and you MIGHT be excused -OR- if you reach the jury selection phase one of the attorneys on the case may "challenge" you off the jury pool furing Voire Dire.
There is no "maximum" age for a juror. It is against Federal Law to discriminate based solely upon age. The competence/fitness of jurors is detemined during "voire dire" when prospective jurors are questioned by the opposing attorneys before being empaneled.
There are no disqualifications to service, but the attornies will usually discover and learn of any potential jurors with pending legal problems during the "voire dire" process, in which prospective jurors are questioned prior to their actual selection to be seated on a jury.
Good voir dire questions should focus on uncovering biases, attitudes, and experiences that potential jurors may have that could impact their ability to be impartial. Questions should be open-ended, specific, and designed to elicit honest responses from jurors. Examples include, "Have you ever been a victim of a crime?" or "Do you have any beliefs that would prevent you from being fair and impartial in this case?"
Absolutely not. HOWEVER - when selecting a jury panel - during Voire Dire, the attorneys questioning the prospective jurors MAY, for their own reasons, exercise a peremptory challenge against certain jurors they feel may be hostile to their case. They do NOT have to explain their reason why, but the sex of the juror could be a factor in a particular case.
It is called a PEREMPTORY CHALLENGE and is exercised during the Voir Dire portion of jury selection.
Only Texas allows juries in custody cases, but jury questions are not allowed in advance. You get the next batch of available jurors on the list.
Voir dire refers to the questioning of prospective jurors, during the jury selection process, by the judge and attorneys. It is used as a means to determine a bias in any juror which may make them unable to judge the issues fairly. When people respond to a jury summons, they gather at the court house to form a pool of potential jurors from which they are called in groups for specific criminal or civil trials. There they are questioned by attorneys for each side and/or the trial judge about their background, life experiences, and opinions to determine whether they can weigh the evidence fairly and objectively. This process is called voir dire, an Anglo-French term meaning "to speak the truth." Voir dire may also involve questioning of an expert witness to determine the level of competency or a hearing held outside the presence of the jury during a trial.
No, voir dire is a process by which the lawyers and parties in a trial question potential jurors or proposed expert witnesses in order to determine if they are qualified to serve as jurors or testify as experts respectively. As to jurors, common questions are as to whether they know any of the parties or witnesses, whether they have formed any opinions of the case already and other such questions to ensure that the potential juror is able to make a fair and unbiased judgment of the facts. As to expert witnesses, the questions are designed to discover the education and experience of the expert witness to ensure that he/she is qualified to render expert opinion testimony on the subject matter in question.
In most jurisdictions, during the voir dire part of the jury selection process, prospective jurors are asked if they know any of the persons involved in the lawsuit. That most often includes the plaintiff, defendant, judge, attorneys and witnesses. If they do, the judge will usually excuse them. This allows the attorneys to keep all of the challenges they are allowed to have. Then, the attorneys can challenge jurors for reasons other than relationship to the other people involved.
No, they should not be able to do so. This is information that is specifically asked of every juror when they undergo Voire Dire prior to the jury selection process. Prospective jurors in such a situation are excused and dismissed from jury duty.
Yes, voir dire is important to attend. It is the process through which potential jurors are questioned by the judge or attorneys to determine their qualifications and suitability to serve on a jury. It allows both sides to gather information about potential biases or prejudices that could impact the jury's decision-making. Attending voir dire can help ensure a fair and impartial jury is selected.
Voir dire is a legal procedure conducted before trial in which the attorneys and the judge question of prospective jurors to determine if any juror is biased and/or cannot deal with the issues fairly, or if there is cause not to allow a juror to serve.