In some parts of the world, yes.
Negligence is often the basis of personal injury lawsuits. In a lawsuit involving the claim of negligence, a plaintiff will be required to prove four elements. These four elements are that the defendant owed the plaintiff a certain duty of care; that the defendant did not exercise due care to the plaintiff; that the defendant's breach of duty somehow caused injury of the plaintiff; and that the plaintiff has suffered damages as a result of defendant's breach of duty. It may be very important for a plaintiff to hire an attorney for one's negligence case. Often, these various elements of negligence have been interpreted in various ways amongst different jurisdictions. In some jurisdictions, there may be a majority rule governing duty of care, while in other jurisdictions the rule differs. A lawyer will know precisely the types of jurisdictions in which a plaintiff's case may be filed and how that jurisdiction may accordingly rule on a case. Each element required for proving negligence may seem straightforward, however, the truth is that the common laws behind each element can become easily complicated. For example, the element of causation contains many different concepts of causation. There may be cause-in-fact causation, or there may be more indirect causes that lead to a plaintiff's injury. It is incredibly important to be precise when filing a negligence cause of action in court. For proving duty of care, a plaintiff will need to show that the defendant had a duty to avoid causing the injury, such that a reasonable person in a similar situation would foresee that the action would cause the injury. In other cases, there may be different standards of care applied to a defendant. For example, if a case deals with a child defendant, than that child may be held to a child standard of care rather than a reasonable person standard of care. The child defendant would be held to act as a reasonable child under the same circumstances and with a like capacity would act. These types of standards are referred to as objective standards. A subjective standard would analyze whether or not a particular defendant acted to the best of his or her judgment. Fulfilling the causation element can also be difficult for a plaintiff within a negligence case. Because there are many types of causation, it is important to have a great lawyer working on one's legal case or scenario.
In Illinois, it is recommended that children under the age of 13 sit in the back seat of a vehicle whenever possible for safety reasons. This is to reduce the risk of injury from airbag deployment in case of a crash. If a child must sit in the front seat, ensure they are in an appropriate child restraint system based on their age, weight, and height.
In Georgia, a parent can kick their child out at age 18, which is the age of majority in the state. Before that age, parents are responsible for providing care and support for their child.
There is no specific age requirement in New York for leaving a child home alone. However, it is recommended that children be at least 12 years old before being left alone for a short period of time. Parents should assess their child's maturity and readiness before making this decision.
Under Republic Act 7610, the punishment for causing physical injuries to a child is imprisonment ranging from 12 years and one day to 20 years, depending on the severity of the injury inflicted. Apart from imprisonment, other penalties such as fines and mandatory counseling may also be imposed on the accused.
Dr. Deere's limp was caused by a hip injury he sustained while trying to save a child from a runaway horse.
Petition for removal - personal injury is a form used in the legal field. This is most commonly used when a parent has caused physical harm to their child and DHS wants to remove the child from that home.
Generally parent's cannot be held responsible for damages caused a child who has reached the age of majority, which in most states is 18. Four states have different age of majority statutes, they are Alabama and Nebraska 19 years old, Mississippi and Pennsylvania 21 years old (with some annotated exceptions). Regardless of the age responsibility for personal injury claims often depends upon specific circumstances. For example how the injury resulted, was it the result to a traffic accident, on property owned by the parents, can any negligence by other parties be attributed to the injury/damages, and so forth. Personal injury attorneys are very good at "working the system" to obtain the maximum damages award possible. It would be in the best interest of the parties involved to consult an attorney who is versant on state laws pertaining to personal injury claims.
You may need a legal opinion depending on the seriousness of the situation. Depending on the age of the child and the state where the loss occurred there may or may not be coverage under the homeowners liability section for injury to others caused by an insured under the policy.
A head injury can cause seizures at any age. This is one of the reasons why when a child bangs their head, they should be checked out
Can you show damages?
It is possible
No, you cannot be directly sued for insuring your child's car. However, if your child causes an accident while driving the insured car, you and your child could be sued for any damages or injuries caused. Insurance helps to mitigate financial liability in such situations.
Anyone can report abuse. Only police and district attorneys can file charges.
yes.
The impact of a deploying airbag striking a rear-facing child seat could result in severe injury or death to the child
can a lien be placed against a personal injury award