0
Not if you are telling the truth. And you have to be able to prove it is the truth. Think about what you would say in a court of law under oath.
And note that you can still be charged with libel, they just won't be able to win, as truth is a defense in libel and slander cases.
What else can I help you with?
The best defense in a libel case?
1. The Truth is accepted as a defense in court 2. Tarnished Reputation - the reputation of the plaintiff was ruined or tarnished beforehand 3. Privileged Communication - Speech is privileged and not actionable under state law.
Is it legal to spread rumors of adult juvenile past?
Spreading rumors about a person's past, whether they are an adult or juvenile, can be considered defamation and may lead to legal consequences. It's important to be cautious about sharing information that can harm another person's reputation, regardless of their age at the time the alleged events occurred.
Defamation of character employing the written word describes?
Defamation of character employing the written word is known as libel. This occurs when false and damaging statements are published and communicated to a third party, leading to harm to a person's reputation. Legal action can be taken against individuals or entities that engage in libelous activities.
Can you be charged in court for libel or slander if the info that had been passed on to someone is true..that is he actually said it but he denied saying it.?
Without knowing where you are and what the legislation for your location is it is quite difficult to answer.The terms libel and slander are quite often misunderstood by the general public, and misused inter-changeably to mean the same thing. Actually, they are quite different acts.Libel is false written communication done with the intent to defame.Slander is false oral statements made with the intent to defame.NOTE that the intent to injure or damage is the key issue in both offenses.(in the US) Both are civil offenses therefore you could not be "charged" in court with a criminal offense. HOWEVER - you COULD be sued for monetary damages for committing these acts.The defense to either charge is:(1) That the information you printed, wrote, or stated actually is true,OR . . .(2) You are only repeating information that is already known by others (i.e.: in the public domain).If you were to be sued, the burden would be on the Plaintiff to prove that the alleged defamatory information was false and that they had been 'injured' or suffered 'damage' of some type.HOWEVER - as the Defendant, you would have a concomitant burden to either present convincing proof that the alleged defamation WAS in fact accurate and true, OR that you were simply repeating what was already known by others and already in the public domain.The TRUTH of the information is the defense against retaliation for spreading it.Without knowing where you are and what the legislation for your location is it is quite difficult to answer.Certainly in most places you could be sued in civil court. It would be then necessary for you to prove that what was allegedly said was actually said.
How does a public official to obtain a damage award under libel laws?
A public official seeking a damage award under libel laws must prove that the statement made was false, made with actual malice (knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth), and caused harm to their reputation. They would need to file a lawsuit for defamation and provide evidence to support their claims in court. The burden of proof is higher for public officials compared to private individuals due to First Amendment protections.
Do you denigrate someone by telling the truth about him?
Oh honey, denigrate means to criticize unfairly or insult someone's reputation. So technically, if you're telling the truth about someone, you're just being honest, not denigrating them. But hey, if the truth hurts, maybe they should work on their reputation a bit.
Someone told a secret that is true but detrimental to your reputation can you sue them?
Yes, you can sue. No, you won't win. In a libel or slander case, the truth is a defense.
Is it illegal to display comments about a person about someone?
No it is not illegal, but it is civilly actionable, someone can sue you for damages. A defense to a charge of libel (written slander) is truth. If it's true, you can defend your right to post it.
Can Harper's magazine be sued for libel?
Yes, Harper's magazine can be sued for libel if it publishes false statements that harm a person's reputation. To win a libel case, the individual would need to prove that the statements were false, defamatory, and made with actual malice (reckless disregard for the truth).
What is libel in journalism?
Libel is stating false claims or accusations about someone in writing In journalism one still has few advantages and libel will not be very easy to argue except that journalist should have belived the same to be true; or even if the same is in public interest, the journalist may go ahead and publish the same. There are several common defenses a reporter has against a libel lawsuit: * Truth Since libel is by definition false, if a journalist reports something that is true it cannot be libelous, even if it damages a person's reputation. Truth is the reporter's best defense against a libel suit. * Privilege Accurate reports about official proceedings - anything from a murder trial to a city council meeting or a congressional hearing - cannot be libelous. This may seem like an odd defense, but imagine covering a murder trial without it. Conceivably, the reporter covering that trial could be sued for libel every time someone in the courtroom accused the defendant of murder. * Fair Comment & Criticism This defense covers expressions of opinion, everything from movie reviews to columns on the op-ed page. The fair comment and criticism defense allows reporters to express opinions no matter how scathing or critical. === ===
What is someone called who disagrees with the truth?
Someone who is a retard to the truth.
What was the outcome of People v Croswell?
Croswell's conviction was upheld, but he didn't suffer any punishment. In 1805, the NY legislature changed their libel law in accordance with how Hamilton had argued the case. Essentially the NY legislature said that truth was an affirmative defense in most libel cases, breaking with English common law. Hamilton's view of Libel law is, broadly speaking, the law through out the United States. There are exceptions, so consult an attorney if you are going to defame someone, esp. a non-public figure, with malicious intent.
Is it better to keep the truth from someone to stop them from getting hurt or to lie to them?
It depends on the truth whether or not it is better to keep the truth from someone to stop them from getting hurt. Sometimes a little white lie is better, if the truth will only hurt someone.
Level with someone?
To level with someone is to tell the truth, the whole truth, and give them the whole story, as to make them "level with you"
"What do you take me for" a question from someone you have feelings with?
Tell him the truth
A party can be liable for defamation for truthful statements if the statement hurts the plaintiff's reputation?
No. Defamation, slander and libel involve use of a false statement. Truth is an absolute defense in a defamation suit.
Does Answers.com actually tell the truth?
no. this website should tell the truth but some of it is a pack of lies!!
