no.slaves can not own other slaves!
The Slave Laws passed in Virginia in 1705 also stated that slaves could not own any property, bear arms, or gather in groups.
Slaves were sometimes tasked with overseeing the work and behavior of other slaves, and may have punished them in order to maintain control and prevent rebellion. Punishing other slaves could also be a way for some slaves to gain favor with their owners and potentially improve their own living conditions.
Under the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, it was required for citizens to assist in the capture of runaway slaves, and individuals could be fined or imprisoned for aiding escaped slaves. Additionally, alleged fugitive slaves were not entitled to a jury trial or allowed to testify on their own behalf.
Besides no longer being someone else's property, freed slaves could learn to read and write (it was against the law in most slave states), vote, own property, have legally recognized marriages, raise their own children without an owner being able to sell them away, travel on their own without a master's permission, be counted fully in the census, earn money from their own labor and keep it, and generally have all the day to day rights we take for granted now. While slavery was the law of the land, freedmen could own their own slaves. Also, while it was legal, in some slave states it was against the law to free a slave at all.
Slave codes did not prevent slaves from physically resisting and rebelling against their owners or attempting escape, although such actions were met with severe consequences. Slave codes also did not prevent slaves from forming close relationships within their communities, practicing their own cultural traditions, or passing on their heritage through oral traditions.
If a slave was important enough it was likely that he or she did own personal slaves
no Actually there's record of former black slaves in Jamaica owning Rominchal gypsies as slaves during the 1650's. At that time a lot of western European nations (including England and Scotland) enslaved gypsies and sold them because they considered them a 'problem.' They did! And in the USA! There are some census records that indicate quite a large percentage of free black slaves in some states (particularly Louisiana) owned slaves. You have to remember that at that time slavery was an accepted part of most societies not just in the Americas. Most black slaves brought over from Africa had likely owned slaves themselves, lived in towns and villages with slaves, or may have already been slaves. Slavery was rampant in the middle east, parts of Asia, and even some parts of Europe. Here's a good site for you to look at, it has the census information on black slave owners dating back to 1790's.
no. you could not own a slave. as soon as Santa Anna, the president of Mexico, said that Texas nor Mexico had the right to own slaves. really... Mexico never aloud it. so no. you could not own a slave in that date of time. they may have aloud slaves at one point but in 1824 you were not aloud to own a slave.
No. There were free blacks who were slave owners, and Indians too.
Most of the southern colonies passed Slave Coded, or laws to control slaves. Colonies with large numbers of slaves had the strictest slave codes. For example, South Carolina's code said that slaves could not hold meeting or own weapons.
Most of the southern colonies passed Slave Coded, or laws to control slaves. Colonies with large numbers of slaves had the strictest slave codes. For example, South Carolina's code said that slaves could not hold meeting or own weapons.
he was a slave
No- Lincoln did not own slaves. He lived his entire adult life in Indiana and Illinois where slavery was not legal so he could not own slaves even if he wanted to .
In West African cultures, slaves were allowed to own slaves of their own, while those in the Atlantic slave trade were not.
No. She was a slave who help conduct other slaves to freedom on the Underground Railroad.
In West African cultures, slaves were allowed to own slaves of their own, while those in the Atlantic slave trade were not.
Most of the southern colonies passed Slave Coded, or laws to control slaves. Colonies with large numbers of slaves had the strictest slave codes. For example, South Carolina's code said that slaves could not hold meeting or own weapons.