is not a crime. before the point of ratification (or the coming in to force) of a price of legislation that crinalizes conduct...the conduct in question is not crinal.
Even though law is made to avoid unconstitutional and unethical actions. It is said that law came first before the crime. Why law came first? It's because you can't identify someone's action as a crime if there is no law punishing that action. To side an instance, Australia allowed abortion and it's not considered as a crime to their country since there is no law punishing it—besides they have a law called Abortion Law that legalize abortion.
An example of an ex post facto law in the Philippines is one that retroactively criminalizes behavior that was not considered a crime when it occurred. For instance, passing a law that makes a certain action illegal and then punishing individuals who committed that action before the law was enacted would be considered an ex post facto law.
Entrapment straddles the lines between criminal law and criminal procedure because it involves the actions of law enforcement in inducing someone to commit a crime. It is a defense in criminal law, asserting that the individual would not have committed the crime if not for the actions of law enforcement. The defense of entrapment can impact the fairness of criminal proceedings, raising questions about due process and police conduct.
The name Outlaw typically refers to someone who has committed a serious crime or who rejects the law and lives outside of it. It can also be a term that conveys a sense of rebellion or defiance against authority.
Probable cause is determined by a statement of the facts in a case, including how much evidence the police have to prove their case. Probable cause is the determination that it is likelier than not a person has committed a crime or is committing a crime. There are different levels of probable cause, including for search warrant and for an arrest warrant. A probable cause for a search warrant isn't necessarily a probable cause for an arrest, and vice versa
Ex Post Facto protects a person from being charged with breaking the law or committing a crime if they committed it before the law went into effect. For example if I committed a crime but at the time it wasn't against the law but they soon passed a law saying that it was illegal they could not come after me for having committed a crime that at that time would not have been a crime.
The Articles of Confederation
A sensational crime is when a crime is committed and then they later build a law off that crime.
commiunity service
Yes, you can be prosecuted for a crime committed in another state if the crime violates federal law or if the states have an agreement for extradition.
Ex Post Facto Law
It is possible, yes.
it means a situation that needs law and order if that makes sense such as in a court house u need order if you committed a crime you need to be punished by law if you committed a crime and is in court then u r in law and order situation
If a law if proposed it then has to be voted on. When the law is passed it is ratified.
A retrospective law is one that is to take effect, at point of time, before it was passed
The procedure to be followed when a crime has been committed is to notify law enforcement as soon as possible. Move to a safe place if in danger.
.... is called a law abiding citizen.