It is difficult to make generalizations about all slaves, as experiences varied greatly. While some slaves may have resorted to theft in order to survive or resist their oppression, it is important to recognize that they were often victims of systemic exploitation and abuse, rather than the aggressors.
When slaves obeyed their masters, they often faced harsh conditions and were subject to physical punishment if they did not comply. Obedience to their masters did not always guarantee leniency or protection, as masters had the authority to mistreat and exploit their slaves as they saw fit.
They became free.
According to James Henley Thornwell, a 19th-century theologian and preacher, slaves who obeyed their masters were fulfilling their duty as stated in the Bible. Thornwell believed that slavery was a fundamental social institution ordained by God, and obedience to masters was a way for slaves to demonstrate their piety and submission to divine authority.
Generally speaking, when slaves obey their masters it is to avoid being beaten or killed. Disobedient slaves are severely punished.
Quarreling with other slaves about their masters allowed slaves to vent frustration and assert their individuality and agency within a system designed to dehumanize and control them. It also served as a way to challenge power dynamics within the slave community and potentially build solidarity among themselves.
Because, they were property to their slave masters, and the slave masters could do anything that they wanted to the slaves in order for the slaves to keep their lives.
no they arent kind to slaves
slaves have to remain loyal to their masters or else they get beaten and whipped. most masters whip their slaves if they don't do what they are asked to. slaves have to be careful and do as they are asked.
Which slaves and when?
When slaves obeyed their masters, they often faced harsh conditions and were subject to physical punishment if they did not comply. Obedience to their masters did not always guarantee leniency or protection, as masters had the authority to mistreat and exploit their slaves as they saw fit.
slave masters wanted to erase the slaves' cultural identity.
Cannibals All! or, Slaves Without Masters was written by George Fitzhugh in 1857
Masters were not kind to their slaves due to a belief in the superiority of their own race, a desire to maintain control and power over others, and economic interests that benefited from the labor of enslaved individuals. This unjust and oppressive system allowed masters to exploit and mistreat their slaves without consequence.
All slaves served their masters for their masters' or their life. Different cultural angles such as America ,gave the owner freedom to release slaves whenever wanted.
Slaves typically do not rebel because their masters have access to weapons and the slaves do not.
Some slaves chose to stay and work for their masters due to fear of punishment, lack of viable alternatives, or emotional ties formed with their masters. Additionally, some slaves may have believed that staying and working for their masters provided them with a sense of security and stability.
slave masters wanted to erase the slaves' cultural identity.