The court, ultimately, can do whatever it wants. The court system is the final arbiter of all laws and of what is right and what is not. While a court decision may ultimately be appealed up the chain of appellate courts sooner or later the decision the final court makes is the binding law and failure to abide by whatever that decision is would be illegal.
It depends on the confidential information. If it is medical information, that is when HIPPA gets involved and without your written consent, can not be shared.Another View: If the attorney is armed with a court order, almost any confidential information dealing with their client can be accessed.
It can mean more than one thing depending upon how the term is applied. A document or documents provided "under seal" means that the information or contents of the document(s) are sworn or attested to. Or - if something of value is provided "under seal" it means that the item(s) were under secure lock or guard from their point of origin to their point of delivery.
It refers to the Federal Rules of Evidence.Rule 502. Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product; Limitations on Waiver(a) Scope of waiver.In federal proceedings, the waiver by disclosure of an attorney-client privilege or work product protection extends to an undisclosed communication or information concerning the same subject matter only if that undisclosed communication or information ought in fairness to be considered with the disclosed communication or information.(b) Inadvertent disclosure.A disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection does not operate as a waiver in a state or federal proceeding if the disclosure is inadvertent and is made in connection with federal litigation or federal administrative proceedings - and if the holder of the privilege or work product protection took reasonable precautions to prevent disclosure and took reasonably prompt measures, once the holder knew or should have known of the disclosure, to rectify the error, including (if applicable) following the procedures in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(B).[( c ) Selective waiver.In a federal or state proceeding, a disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection - when made to a federal public office or agency in the exercise of its regulatory, investigative, or enforcement authority - does not operate as a waiver of the privilege or protection in favor of non-governmental persons or entities. The effect of disclosure to a state or local government agency, with respect to non-governmental persons or entities, is governed by applicable state law. Nothing in this rule limits or expands the authority of a government agency to disclose communications or information to other government agencies or as otherwise authorized or required by law.]**(d) Controlling effect of court orders.A federal court order that the attorney-client privilege or work product protection is not waived as a result of disclosure in connection with the litigation pending before the court governs all persons or entities in all state or federal proceedings, whether or not they were parties to the matter before the court, if the order incorporates the agreement of the parties before the court.(e) Controlling effect of party agreements.An agreement on the effect of disclosure of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work product protection is binding on the parties to the agreement, but not on other parties unless the agreement is incorporated into a court order.(f) Included privilege and protection.As used in this rule:(1) "attorney-client privilege" means the protection provided for confidential attorney-client communications, under applicable law; and(2) "work product protection" means the protection for materials prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial, under applicable law
Most civil court judgements are sealed by request of one party. Almost all out of court settlements are sealed as a matter of mutual consent. If the case reached verdict and neither party asked for a seal then it is public record but this is rare.
In most cases, information about pending DCF (Department of Children and Families) cases is confidential to protect the privacy of the individuals involved. Typically, this information is not readily accessible to the public. If you are directly involved in the case, you may contact DCF directly to inquire about its status.
Privileged information refers to communications between certain individuals, like lawyers and clients, that are protected from disclosure in court. Confidential information, on the other hand, is any information that is kept private and not shared with others.
Confidential information refers to sensitive data that should be kept private, while privileged information is a legal protection that allows certain communications to be kept confidential in court.
You should not be able to do this without a court order, as the payroll information is confidential.
The laws of disclosure. Disclosure essentially means the lawyers within court (defence and prosecution) must show and display any information or arguments they may bring up in court.
It depends on the confidential information. If it is medical information, that is when HIPPA gets involved and without your written consent, can not be shared.Another View: If the attorney is armed with a court order, almost any confidential information dealing with their client can be accessed.
Many jurisdictions have "freedom of information" or "right to know" laws that ensure the public access to documents created with public money or submitted to public officials, with exceptions for confidential information as defined in the local version of the law. A planning document could (in theory) contain confidential investment plans or other sensitive information that can be removed ('redacted') prior to the documents being released for public review. Some statutes authorize a court to order disclosure of public documents if they are not released within a short period.
A lawyer's duty of confidentiality typically ends when the information is no longer confidential, such as when the client consents to its disclosure or when the information becomes public. Additionally, the duty may terminate if the lawyer is required by law to disclose certain information, such as to prevent a crime or to comply with a court order. However, it's important to note that the duty of confidentiality often extends beyond the end of the attorney-client relationship, as it is meant to protect the client's interests.
A sealed subpoena is a legal document that orders an individual or entity to produce evidence or testify in a court proceeding, but it is kept confidential and not publicly accessible. This confidentiality can be requested to protect sensitive information, privacy concerns, or ongoing investigations. The sealing of the subpoena prevents the disclosure of its contents or the existence of the subpoena itself until the relevant legal matters are resolved.
Confidentiality --information known to accounting professionals may not be disclosed to outsiders except when professional work papers are subpoenaed by a court. (Accountants do not have attorney-client privilege.)
The Canterbury court generally emphasizes the importance of full disclosure in legal proceedings. They believe that openness and transparency are crucial for achieving fair outcomes and ensuring justice. Failing to disclose relevant information can lead to misunderstandings, bias, or unfair advantage, which may harm the integrity of the legal process.
Generally and ethically it isn't OK. It may even be illegal. Some profession are prohibited from revealing confidential matters without a court order. Lawyers and doctors for instance.
No. You can petition the court and request that your information be kept sealed and confidential. You can obtain help and free information at your local domestic violence center.