If the doc tells anybody anything about you.... that is MALPRACTICE for which you can sue his butt (unless you give him/her permission as when you are referred to another doc). One of the reasons we go to ANY doc is because we trust them. That includes maintaining confidentiality.
If there is evidence of a crime such as a bullet wound, sexual abuse, abuse of a child or any crime, the law protects the person or child or anybody who is a victim. in these cases the law states the doc MUST report it. Since it is required by law he/she is protecting the victim and can not be sued.
Another View: The ethics of the AMA (American Medical Association) and the doctors profession impose an ETHICAL code of silence on him - The LAW respects and acknowledges this ETHICAL practice but the doctor's "code of confidentiality," is NOT necessarily codifed in the law in all jurisdictions. Also, as mentioned in the previous answer, there are many exceptions to it. ADDITIONALLY: Within recent times the 'Health Information Privacy and Portability Act' (HIPPA) places further restrictions on medical practitioners and medical facilities.
1.in contract duties are fixed by parties. In torts duties are imposed by law. 2. Contracts necessiates privity between parties which is not needed to maintain an action in tort. 3. In contracts duty is owed to parties(specific persons). In tort duty is owed to society at large. 4. Contract damages for breach may be liquidated or unliquidated. In tort they are unliquidated (fixed by the court) . Naz231@ymail.com
This legal obligation is known as the duty of care. It requires individuals to act with the same level of care that a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances to prevent harm to others. Failure to meet this duty could result in liability for negligence in tort law.
A tort IS a civil, as opposed to a criminal, wrong.
Someone who breaks the law is arrested.
The common law imposed no obligation upon a person to help a stranger in an emergency. However, taking a cue from the New Testament, the common law did adopt what became commonly known as the "good samaritan" defense, meaning that someone who helps a stranger in an emergency and acts reasonably in doing so would be protected against a claim of injury by the stranger against the samaritan.
No, that is Doctor/patient confidentiality. Saying that, that is the law in England, if you asking this in another country then I am not sure.
The key legal considerations that govern the doctor-patient relationship under the doctor-patient relationship law include confidentiality, informed consent, duty of care, and the patient's right to privacy. These laws outline the responsibilities and rights of both doctors and patients to ensure ethical and lawful interactions in healthcare settings.
A lawyer's duty of confidentiality typically ends when the information is no longer confidential, such as when the client consents to its disclosure or when the information becomes public. Additionally, the duty may terminate if the lawyer is required by law to disclose certain information, such as to prevent a crime or to comply with a court order. However, it's important to note that the duty of confidentiality often extends beyond the end of the attorney-client relationship, as it is meant to protect the client's interests.
Tort law is simply the duty of careand legal obligation of an individual to adhere to a standard of care while performing acts that could harm others. The claiment must be able to show a duty of care imposed by law which the defendant has breached.
1.the state or quality of being in conformity with the law; lawfulness. 2.attachment to or observance of law. 3.Usually, legalities. a duty or obligation imposed by law.
If one neglects or fails to meet their legal obligation of ensuring the safety and well-being of those in their employ or care, they are said to have failed their duty of care and may therefore be found to be negligent under the law.
law and legal issues
The answer depends on how one defines "law". If the definition is limited to regulation imposed by a legislative body then, no, the law is not equal to the sum total of rules imposed on society. If law is broadly defined to include customs, taboos, and informal social contracts then the answer is yes, the law is equal to the sum total of rules imposed on a society.
A serious charge imposed by military units could be desertion, which is the act of abandoning one's duty or post without authorization. This is considered a serious offense under military law and can result in severe consequences such as imprisonment or dishonorable discharge.
yes if you have ever paid that doctor money for any kind of treatment than he is bound by the Doctor/patient confidentiality laws. Check it out further here http://www.enotes.com/everyday-law-encyclopedia/patient-rights
1.in contract duties are fixed by parties. In torts duties are imposed by law. 2. Contracts necessiates privity between parties which is not needed to maintain an action in tort. 3. In contracts duty is owed to parties(specific persons). In tort duty is owed to society at large. 4. Contract damages for breach may be liquidated or unliquidated. In tort they are unliquidated (fixed by the court) . Naz231@ymail.com
Legalities are obligations imposed by law.